StreetSurveyor's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 145390242 | almost 2 years ago | This was an interesting "street". Tried to go all the way through from the upper Warwick portion but it turned into a driveway. Accessed it off of Division Street, no signs indicating Saddlebrook Drive (or private). East Greenwich GIS, https://next.axisgis.com/East_GreenwichRI/ didn't show it as part of the roads but the Warwick one, https://www.axisgis.com/warwickri/ previously did. In looking again today, the road name is gone. I'm going to remove the name all together and turn it into a driveway because that seems most appropriate. |
| 145273831 | about 2 years ago | |
| 145202582 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for letting me know. I was unaware of the discussion to make them service. |
| 144850523 | about 2 years ago | It's been a while since I've run this road. I'll adjust to a service road. Good suggestion! |
| 144610233 | about 2 years ago | Do you have a source that shows that all of this beyond the road up to Melrose should be called Collins Ave? https://next.axisgis.com/SaugusMA/ does not indicate that naming. |
| 144570856 | about 2 years ago | You can access it off of the Warren official page. Here is the link to the official GIS:
|
| 144488537 | about 2 years ago | That is the same GIS site. This portion doesn’t show private like others do (Ocean Lawn) for example. |
| 144457428 | about 2 years ago | Okay. I surveyed it in May and at the time, the only thing restricted was the part originally marked on Gammell which completely threw off my route! |
| 144457428 | about 2 years ago | Cliff and Barclay had no restrictions so permissive seems the most appropriate. |
| 144457428 | about 2 years ago | This portion of Gammell is open prior to the gate based on my survey. The majority that is marked private was the accurate placement of the private tag. A while back, you gave kudos to my adjustment of leaving this small section unrestricted when you had marked all of Gammell private. |
| 144457386 | about 2 years ago | This portion of the road is open and the gate is another aesthetic gate. We both have it marked further down where the access is restricted. |
| 141234953 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for the assist on this one! |
| 141402069 | over 2 years ago | I have physically run these roads this year. |
| 140937342 | over 2 years ago | This change is not appropriate. There is no gate here. This section is open and should not be private. |
| 140734411 | over 2 years ago | There was a street sign present when I ran it. If you want, edit it to where the gate begins but it is a road with a street sign. |
| 139884906 | over 2 years ago | Correct! I edited the east of the gate to open since there's no restrictions on that portion. The gate definitely threw me off on one of my planned running routes. :-/ |
| 137856759 | over 2 years ago | They were present approximately 12 days ago. |
| 138163832 | over 2 years ago | The road names are coming from a combination of the official Chilmark street listing as well as what's physically present on the the signs. |
| 130732404 | almost 3 years ago | I edited Marblehead when I ran it. If a street was marked private, but open/accessible to be ran, I changed it. I only mark a street private when it has a gate and/or you are prohibited to run it. |
| 130924176 | almost 3 years ago | I edited Marblehead when I ran it. If a street was marked private, but open/accessible to be ran, I changed it. I only mark a street private when it has a gate and/or you are prohibited to run it. |