You were fast! :)

Sorry, wrong changeset comment! This was adding a ghost bike from survey.

Hallo SDimona! Auf dem Straßenschild stand vor ein paar Jahren "Hiehl", und im Kadaster war es falsch. Hat sich das geändert? In der Zwischenzeit hab ich das auf "Hiehl" ver(schlimm)bessert.

It’s definitely the exception, and it’s only a thing for “new” municipalities. Another example off the top of my head is Käerjeng which doesn't really have a French translation.

Hi Jeroen! Multilingualism in Luxembourg is a bit of a mess. The official name of the commune that's also used in government open data is Groussbus-Wal, so that's what we've used. I use it for street name completion QA checks, so I'll change it back.

Hello! This looks like an automated edit that broke at least one name. Can you please share your methods?

Nice talk ;)

Danke dir!

Ahh, thank you for that!

Moien! Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edit.

Cool use of MapWarper! Nice job!

Used Strava too for the Bramley summit trail

Hi Brandon! Indeed, it is now. Thank you!

If you search for “Sauron tower Brooklyn” it’s pretty clear.

Willkommen in der OpenStreetMap-Community! Es ist großartig zu sehen, dass du dich aktiv beteiligst und bei der Kartierung hilfst. Ich habe bemerkt, dass du bei einigen Namen die deutsche Version hinzugefügt hast, was eine wertvolle Ergänzung ist. Ich möchte dir einige freundliche Tipps geben, um die Datenqualität und Konsistenz weiter zu verbessern.

In der deutschen Sprache werden Bindestriche oft verwendet, um separate Namensteile in Straßennamen zu verbinden, wie z.B. "Marie-Adelheid-Platz" statt "Marie Adelheid Platz". Auch das Eszett (ß) ist ein wichtiges Element in der deutschen Orthographie. Anstatt "ss" zu verwenden, wäre es korrekter, "ß" zu benutzen, wo es angebracht ist, z.B. "Straße" statt "Strasse".

Um die Namen in verschiedenen Sprachen sauber zu trennen, empfiehlt es sich, spezifische Tags für jede Sprache zu verwenden. Für deutsche Namen wäre das Tag name:de ideal. Also anstatt name="Place Marie-Adélaïde - Marie-Adelheid Platz", wäre es genauer, name="Place Marie-Adélaïde" und name:de="Marie-Adelheid-Platz" zu nutzen. Im Editor ist das unter Mehrsprachiger Namen -> Deutsch zu finden. Auf way/478889453 hast du es genau richtig gemacht.

Diese Praktiken helfen dabei, die Daten auf OpenStreetMap präzise und benutzerfreundlich zu gestalten. Deine Beiträge sind wirklich wertvoll, und ich freue mich darauf, weiterhin mit dir zusammenzuarbeiten. Bei Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung. Weiter so!

Guillaume

Thank you for fixing the sidewalks I'd accidentally tagged as crossings!

Hi! Lepa Brena is the local name for this building: https://oralhistorykosovo.org/points_of_interests/elektro-kosova-lena-brena/

Welcome aboard woodpeck!

Your additions help making the map more accurate and useful for everyone. There are two practices that can significantly enhance the quality of your contributions: providing clear changeset comments and maintaining a concise bounding box (bbox) for your changesets.

Changeset comments are crucial because they provide context to your edits. They allow other mappers to understand your rationale, the sources of your information, and the nature of the changes you’ve made. This is particularly beneficial in case of disputes or if clarification is needed. It's about clearly communicating the intent of your contributions, which is essential in a collaborative project like OpenStreetMap.

Keeping a tight bbox for your changesets is equally important. A bbox that closely encapsulates the area of your actual edits makes it easier for others to review your work and to understand the geographical scope of your changes. It reduces confusion and helps in maintaining a well-organised and manageable database. Here, your small changes cover a rectangle going from Karlsruhe to almost Strasbourg.

Happy mapping, and welcome once more!

Guillaume

I see three questions here.

1. Are there cliffs?

Yes. The area is known for its cliffs which sometimes roll down to the houses.

https://lequotidien.lu/tag/tawioun/

https://www.virgule.lu/luxembourg/eboulements-a-luxembourg-certains-quartiers-plus-menaces-que-d-autres/135717.html

I have no idea whether the black lines shown on the lidar are really cliffs, or how big they are individually, but they certainly look like cliffs, and there certainly are cliffs there.

2. What are the standards to map a cliff?

That's the kind of thing where the admins say that people should talk: what constitutes a cliff, a way? What are the minimal standards we have consensus on to map them? There has been no good faith attempt at discussing them. https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/luxembourg is barren, and the Luxembourg chat is very very quiet these days.

3. Is this kind of changeset comment good?

No. It makes the recipient feel attacked. It makes no attempt at being constructive or at building consensus. It's part of the problem, not the solution, and reflects badly on the commenter. The fact that the recipient has left comments in a similar tone in the past doesn't justify the tone. This kind of discussion culture is toxic for a community.

I urge all participants to read up on non-violent communication, and to be disciplined in keeping their comments constructive.

In the age of chatgpt, it is trivial to get over your anger and have a robot redraft your messages in a way that doesn't make the other feel attacked: https://chat.openai.com/share/2dc1c774-1808-4cb2-9b48-edd53a9fa3a6

Hi Rossch,

Do you maybe remember where you found the address of "22 Schullstrooss" for the FC Berdenia Berbourg stadium clubhouse? I can't find a trace of this address anywhere else.

Happy mapping,

Guillaume