If this really is a public_bridleway, it's probably a "bridleway" rather than a "footway". Also, it probably joins the road?

I'm guessing that node/1706257198 isn't really a "hunting stand" within the normal meaning of the term.

Is way/328986181/history perhaps some sort of small building?

There seems to be a discrepancy between the designation on way/111513802/history ("public_footpath") and the changeset comment on changeset/28254518 ("Public Bridleway")?

Needs survey to check.

way/327712752#map=16/45.5397/26.6345 here has no tags, but it does match an underlying GPS trace. Needs a survey to find out what it really is (and a bit of tidying where it duplicates a bit of road).

Is way/326788334 really not a oneway? It seems fairly unlikely that it isn't, but the parallel road is. A number of other roads nearby where also changed to "not oneway" at the same time, and a couple of nearby dual-carriageway roads were not added as oneway to start with. All could do with checking.

Somewhere here there's probably a cemetery. Someone had added the name "Cemetry" to relation/3353788 (which it clearly isn't) but presumably there's one somewhere; I'm guessing at the village end.

See changeset discussion comment on changeset/27882876

Is "locality" really the best way to tag way/338935213/history ? Sounds like some sort of landuse might be more appropriate.

Need more GPS traces here. The northbound path is from a single trace, but doesn't match the imagery - I suspect it actually joins further to the west, where the stop path is.

changeset/29255061 suggests that there's some sort of dog training centre here which needs mapping. Also the road probably doesn't double back on itself.