Is way/60696168 here really just called "Notts"? Seems unlikely.

I'm guessing that node/4413229289 is a duplicate of the note that someone has added just across the road? Presumably neither are tourist attractions.

I don't believe that all the extra roads mapped here actually exist. The corresponding roundabout the other side of the A1 had a similar problem, which I fixed in changeset/36488962 , but didn't get enough time to look at the layout this side of the A1. Although way/27248869 does exist as mapped, I suspect that way/177662105, way/307620649 and way/231963920 do not. Needs a proper check though

Needs a proper survey. My recollection is that there is no "road within the middle of the road" here. What there is is a right-turn lane - and that's what should be mapped.

From my recollection (and I'm pretty familiar with the area) the road as mapped bears no resemblance to reality. There is no "road in the middle of the road" here. I suspect that rhe "road" up towards Ledenham is also not an unclassified road. Needs a proper survey.

way/227723791 has a couple of problems. It's a footpath that doesn't "go anywhere" (presumably at the northern end it actually joins the road?). Also it's had "bicycle=dismount" merged onto it by mistake from the railway crossing. What are the real access rules for each part of this way?

My recollection is that this junction is incorrect - there aren't four roads here, only one or perhaps 2, with a former stretch of dual carriageway now being used for a turn lane?

Is "natural=heath" correct for way/241361362#map=18/56.10427/-3.93210 here? It was originally mapped as "natural=heather", but someone who isn't local didn't understand that and changed it to "natural=heath". What's the best tag? It might be something comepletely different again.