way/355320343 needs a proper survey to see what the access rights are. My recollection is that all paths across the golf course here that are not public footpaths / bridleways are clearly marked on the ground as private.

The footpath way/368140495#map=16/52.9848/-1.6272 needs survey. It's been added based on out-of-copyright maps, yet based on a ground survey of the road I suspect it exits south of the woodland on North Lane at node/1177832370 . Also, how does it cross the service road at way/368140495#map=18/52.98895/-1.63024 ?

The newly added footpaths here such as way/356627173 seem to be more of a "tube map" - topologically correct, but don't match the imagery. Needs a ground survey.

The area round here needs a proper ground survey - lots of features have been questionably added based on over-enthusiastic interpretation of aerial imagery.

My recollection (based upon walking way/188987402 ) was that it can get a bit muddy here which might explain some of the variability.

way/206770942 has been "armchaired" and probably does not exist. I certainly didn't notice it.

way/356627174 does not exist as mapped (it runs through what looks like a sewage farm). It also crosses the main road without joining it.

Please don't "armchair" map this to fix errors reported on a QA site - it needs a proper survey to see what actually exists and what does not. Additionally, QA site errors are useful to indicate areas needing proper a survey.

Check the phone masts etc. here.
The EE one node/10085838209 still exists.
There's one by the "communications_transponder" node/5587204812 .
I don't believe that there is an O2 one by the new car park node/10085838208 .
Has the O2 one moved north, and is the "communications_transponder" something different?