OpenStreetMap
SomeoneElse's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by SomeoneElse
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 314459 | SomeoneElse | Here way/29496396 is a "foot=designated; highway=path" which obviously duplicates some roads here. How much of that duplicate road is actually designated as e.g. public_footpath (and is it that, or something like a bridleway)? |
|||
| 3193439 | SomeoneElse | Apparently the Old Grey Mare has reopened (as something - not entirely sure what) at Easter 2022 |
|||
| 439698 | EdLoach | OS OpenData StreetView shows this lane as a continuation of B5410 - perhaps someone local can confirm and update? |
|||
| 2820553 | ubegxj | Unable to answer "Does the bus stop Canham Grove have tactile pavings?" for node/1602972775 via StreetComplete 33.2: Unclear whether these are intended to be tactile Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 3510492 | ElectricDuck | Is this 54,56? |
|||
| 908539 | Yusuf Ilter | £0.50p off peak
|
|||
| 81653 | SomeoneElse | This footpath doesn't reflect reality. You're not restricted to walking down to a dead end from which there is no exit - what there actually is is a roadside sidewalk from which you can cross the road at any point. |
|||
| 2186233 | Radlinski | This diagonal footpath linking Doe Lane and Geer Lane doesn’t exist! |
|||
| 670597 | AsgerFrank | Shouldn't this way (highway=footway) be more appropriately tagged? The way is part of a LCN-bicycle-route, relation/3322620, therefore some tagging allowing cycling seems required. I stumbled over this, browsing the opencyclemap for edit-hints on relations in general (no survey). Incidentally, the route does not appear very "route-like" as the ones I'm familiar with so far. Apparently it merely reflects plain bicycle markings, but maybe it serves a purpose (in GB). |
|||
| 87620 | SomeoneElse | Check road name - current road name differs from what was originally surveyed. |
