Hi,

Please note the warnings listed with this change set. I've corrected several not included but please check where ways are crossing buildings, buildings crossing buildings and crossing roads not connected and correct those issues.

happy mapping

OK, pochi aggiustamenti.

changeset/135463792

Si noti che Bing ha un offset sostanziale rispetto a ESRI come viene avvertito per tin l'editor JOSM. Ciò si traduce in un posizionamento incoerente degli edifici, in particolare quando diversi mappatori lavorano nello stesso con immagini diverse.

ciao

"risolto gran problema in piazza" causa ora grande problemi in piazza...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.26606&lat=42.43374&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Could it be trungbin2009 the node data was integrated into the area. I see lots off tags on there
relation/1903516/history

argh, Cellino Attanasio landcover and use, large calanchi zones. TBC

This way needs splitting up, west to east, the second half add smoothness=bad. That is enough to keep cycle routing away but for maybe MTB. I'd have to go back into the gps traces to find where the speed goes down to pedestrian.

Resolves about 60 unconnected highway-highway crossings flags.

Hi,

not going to ask why you decided to mangle various tags and combine payment methods, but I've done it proper again as per OSM tagging standards. Thanks for leaving them alone.

ciao

OK, first section done, added half dozen cutlines where powerlines run.

ciao

Hi,

Your monster forest (2387 members) disappeared from view. I see you closed the gap late last night which is good, the question though being: You've been working on this since 2015 at least. Why not split this relation in manageable and maintainable parcel? Just getting this to download and render and validate takes ages! I just tried is JOSM, 5 minutes and 63 members less near Terlago, the split somewhat down where not yet mapped cutlines are (function?) . Did not upload, just saved it as a local session, ready to go, if you're OK with that.

cheers

Actually I did not, so the history shows, but have removed the stray tags and moving on.

ciao

Good to see the tree actually did exist ;O)

See no need. If there's a key/tagging issue OSM Inspector or Osmose will sent me an alert. Not going to check on ground if a tree of genus X actually exists. But to make it simple, I you verified it ain't there, chop it down.

--//--

Actually I did not move anything, I just removed the illegal \ character.

Hi,

You ask me 2 years after the fact? I corrected a key tag typo in the level0 editor, one does not see any imagery

ciao

Hi crumou

Seen you do this couple of times: When 1 area like here a scrub zone, shares the outline of a larger area, it has to be mapped as outside without any inner/outer role to in this case the wood. In this case I've split the scrub and wood and made each a simple polygon. See changeset/134331066 for the change

If you need clarification, feel free to ask or revisit the multipolygon wiki which details what's outer and inner, special attention for multiple inside areas that form a single inner zone requiring a separate 'inner' outlines which enclose these.

ciao

Hi,

Yes, the issue was though that these POI were flagged as having to be standalone. Maybe map them with virtual paths to these indoor room walls.

PS, only came here to fix some way conflicts when JOSM editor flagged these. Why information windows have to be mapped separate but wall mounted defibrillator, atm are fine on building/room walls but as we call them 'sportello' somehow are not.

For your "Objets trouvés" there's a tag office=lost_property and amenity=lost_property_office. Both have a OSM wiki page. Maybe add these and remove the tourism tag will stop the alert.

ciao

3D Render with proper oultine relation per F4 Demo
https://demo.map.f4-group.com/#lat=40.7623413&lon=29.9090840&zoom=20&camera.phi=147.308&goto_f4map=goto_f4map

And we have a winner, no more rendering of wetland through rivers and canals, in this worked over zone.

Think we(me) got most all done on this segment, several confused and blank areas outside like something called Ilha de Matadouce just represented by a simple node.