Someone who closes a change set with just a single full stop in the comment field. How can that be right?

... and exit with resolving the warning that would have appeared in ID Editor to do something about. "warnings:crossing_ways:building-building" which is self explainatory... one of the buildings was mapped whole or part top of a road.

Plz fix. NB: If you had responded to the warning before saving, the editor would have jumped you straight back to the problem point, now I wish you good luck finding the one of the 144 buildings you added in this 1/4 of the globe spanning CS. The warning does suggest a 'ignore issue' was selected, at least, for me that's the only way to get past the problem point and I absolutely hate to do so.

And then save when there's an error warning to include. "warnings:disconnected_way:highway". Please fix!

Someone mapping big time tagged this road 3 years ago with the name 'Agri Service Road'. S/he must have been in a silly mood.

Lol, I mapped it myself 3 months ago... these lines a practically invisible on standard carto rendering.

Part 2 CS comment, woodland, farmland, scrub and pond. A double weir/dam spillway, west to east flow line tagged artificial as not knowing where the presumed tunnel is going.

Resolved 4 issues on just 1 item and a bunch more unflagged.

Repeat: the width of the river deserves area mapping here as well as splitting the north and south riverbank woodland.

Note that the stream overflow area was without wood inner tag [yes] for rendering, to show it's a wooded zone!

This merge worked.

Is fine, problem elsewhere.

And then there were a few cliffs one likes to avoid wandering thru the wood.

hi,

please review the changes I made to your edits in the hospital area

1) when highway=construction is put on a way, you also need to tag what is being constructed... construction=*
2) When a highway goes thru a building you need to add the tag tunnel=building_passage, not simply put the way up in the air with layer=1 for then the question is: Where's the bridge?
3) You did not connect the way to the way's it was crossing. This should have given you warnings during the edit but since you put the road in the air with layer=1, again a bridge was indicated as missing.
4) Why were the tags from the old pronto soccorso route not matched on the new PS route? Is everyone allowed to use this new way? Is the ambulance to wait in line for common traffic?

(use www translate service if you don't understand my comments).

cheers

Fatto e grazie

\o/

OK, prossima change set io risolvere i faux pas. ;O)

Apologies for the large CS, but was caught out by touching a road that had flixbus tags on them and insisting the needed brand tags (Ignore is to me not an acceptable option).

That' Cda Colle Serra

Excellent, and now we know, the whole of the Italian mapping community, of whom takes interest, can know.
Thanks for resolving.

cheers

hi,

FYI, or something to action, your 'Sistemazione' has caused/did not resolve 22 "warnings:outdated_tags:noncanonical_brand"

ciao

found it, a self intersection will do that. fatto.