Hi,

Frankly, bad mapping.... disconnection of overlapping nodes,, areas without tags, overlapping multipolygon areas with inner areas that are not inner and from history you seems to change the same like now removing the caravans and motorhome tags. Please let it rest. Next time I'll use the reversing tools.

ciao

Hi Afanasovich

Checked you're still mapping to be sure to not wake you up from OSM retirement as this is rather late, 3 years after, but stumbled on a typo for gore_chevron. which you misspelled as gore_shevron. Also this tag is on multipolygons but no feature tag was added, so marked them all as area:highway=traffic_island, + traffic_island=painted which they appear all to be.

Let me know it this is a problem and I'll reverse

cheers

OK, think I found it, in a place not expected.

node/4348295445

cheers

(Somehow my OverpassTurbo query looking for place=sea keeps timing out with only the Adriatic in view.)

Hi again.

Since you did not respond to my previous CS comment, I went ahead and changed the islet roles with Ischia from inner to outer since they're outside of the main island sea coast.

changeset/161936303

Also added natural coastline since that is found on other islets as well.

Doubt this will resolve the main issue of Southern Italy being highlighted in OSM Inspector, a half dozen boundary roles missing that are on the others but at least this bug is fixed.

Здравствуйте

Revert changeset/161926417

This edit set has been reverted as gpx traces imported on top of existing ways. See changeset/161926417

Ciao,

con questo e con il precedente set di modifiche che importavano le tracce gpx, hai creato nuove vie in aggiunta a quelle esistenti. Ripristinerò queste due vie.
changeset/161901088
changeset/161917477
Mi dispiace, ma se vuoi modificare la geometria e i tag delle caratteristiche devi farlo sulle vie esistenti. Di sicuro so per esperienza personale che i gpx generati in bicicletta non sono molto precisi, ma possono essere usati come guida per mappare nuove vie o correggerle.

PS

Added the tax office name used as official_name

Hi,

Your remapped highway=cycleway=lane is same problem as before, invalid mapping/tagging. If you like to see the cycleways already mapped and rendered visit the openstreetmap website and select layers Y (CycleOSM) and C (Cycle Map) to see them. Sometimes it has a day delay before new ones show as the maps are not refreshed continuously.

As sample view. Cycleways tagged on a road are directly affixed to the side of the road and are dashed lines blue. Cycleways mapped separately will show as individual ways that follow their own way and are solid blue. An example
changeset/160122232#map=20/42.7268387/13.9847495&layers=Y

Names generally go on the route relations, not on the road segments it self if directly parellel to the road. Here you see they carry the tag BI-6 since they are officially part of the Ciclovia Adriatica 6, also known as Bice Italia 6.

Ciao

Thx for your reply. I've 'razed' tagged a building and that wall to be sure that no one will remap it using PCN 2012 again as I saw recently in an edit. Added ways and parking to make it semi 2024.

changeset/159887055

Tried it in ID editor for a change but by Jove, found no functions that can make a series of nodes on a bend way into a smooth curve. Must exist though since I see ID edit users with long high node count create the smoothest arcs in ways.

cheers.

Hi marcoSt

Since I see you're still mapping, a question about this oddly shaped wall that you mapped 9 years ago. way/369367345/history
I was mapping some road details, added a parking, a footway, moved the Lidl POI over the building when noticing. The wall criss-crosses over the Lidl supermarket which seemingly was mapped by you at the same time. Is it some artifact, an historical object that no one can see anymore, or like here, the city put thick glass in the pavement so you can see what's below... watching relics while shopping :o))). Maybe it needs moving to layer=-1 or has a better place in Open Historic Maps (OHM). One end node is connected to the building i.e. must have had a purpose.

No hurry, just curious, which is known to kill cats.

cheers.

Oops, hit the Upload too quick. Close gap in bus route 590 on the Piazza dei Re di Roma.

Ciao

FYI: changeset/159489730

You've done duplicate ways, some with many nodes in other change sets as well along the Adriatic coast area. Some have been fixed by other mappers, not sure if all were caught.

Happy mapping

changeset/159359886

Also add missing public_transport:version=2 tags to bus routes passing there and missing.

Hi,

Finally took the time and tried to fix the situation on Laurenziano and Tiburtina.

1) Laurenziano, restored the lost name and added some tags such as lanes and parking rules.
2) Tiburtina, moved boundary tags to old way which was mapped as service/no access/lanes:psv. Presume that's no longer the case since tertiary implies it's not psv only anymore so please check the tags. 2 lanes is my guess.

Transferring the boundary tags to the old service road and change that from service to tertiary was easiest as that one held all the bus routes. which I did not want to break.

Again, please verify if all is now matching what's on the ground and check the bus/psv lane tags and access.

I've saved a copy of the dataset prior to my changes so anything that was there can be restored.

Got doubts of the oneway on Tiburtina since finding jul-2024 imagery with regular cars going both directions. For sure the right end of that new way you drew top of the service way cant be going west bound as everything where it connects to the secondary of Tiburtina is going eastbound. Just in case, I've cut your tertiary into sections to make it easy for each part to have a change of direction, or oneway=no where parts are bi-directional.

ciao

My CS, where the original duplicate way has been removed from.

Hi Ludovico

I've made some changes of your 'named' natural areas to boundary since they were overlapping/crossing previously mapped areas in detail (can't do that). Also your 'named' areas have overlaps and gaps themselves, I've resolved the overlaps by best guess. The task is up to you to fill in the natural areas exact and detailed following the previously mapped zones. I've added a few rock, scree, wood zones and a nameless stream of which the details you can find in this change set changeset/159158982

Question: What are the sources for these 'named' zones, found 9, some of them flagged because of the mentioned overlaps with previously mapped landcover details.

If you have questions, let me know

happy mapping.

SekeRob