Scottie0001's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123933048 | over 3 years ago | Welcome to OSM. I would just like to make you aware that your edit involved adding a few buildings in Cairns, Australia causing your edit to span across 2 countries. It is recommended that you do edits in one country at at time maximum. If you have any further questions, just let us know. |
| 123362058 | over 3 years ago | Incorrect Comment, correct comment below:
|
| 122860023 | over 3 years ago | Welcome! I would like to let you know that you have made your edit correctly. So you are aware, I have moved the original node to a building under building #26325671 and also added some additional tags to supplement the tags currently there. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask anyone. If you haven't already, have a look at the Australian wiki page found below:
|
| 122596452 | over 3 years ago | Bing Imagery shows the up to date information in regards to road realignment after the recent roadwork. |
| 122596452 | over 3 years ago | Hi, multiple of your edits you have made in the past few days have made the map less accurate including removing an exit number that exists. The previous state of the map was more accurate and the GPS traces have made the map less accurate. The previous alignment was more accurate in particular on the Ipswich Motorway. Your edits have made the map less accurate and I suggest that you not just rely off GPS traces. |
| 121917569 | over 3 years ago | The section of road that has "limousine" is tagged based of the Australian Tagging Guidelines and also based of Queensland road rules for Bus Lanes |
| 121890014 | over 3 years ago | Hi, I would just like to inform you that tagging relation/14214448 (Toohey Forest) as park would be incorrect due to the size, the amount of trees, the low amount of picnic areas and majority of the paths in the area not being paved. I have changed the area to a "Nature Reserve" to more correctly reflect Toohey Forest. |
| 114765429 | over 3 years ago | Refer to Discord discussion https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/471231032645910529/977106070818402324 |
| 120901766 | over 3 years ago | Please provide a better explanation of what you have changed. Please keep your edits to one country per changeset where possible. |
| 120886184 | over 3 years ago | Please provide a better explanation of what you have changed. Please keep your edits to one country per changeset where possible. Regarding the following way, it does not exist as why would you have a hut build on an island and over water in the middle of the ocean with the name 'christophers house" where no one lives
|
| 120686752 | over 3 years ago | What sort of updates did you do? |
| 120492714 | over 3 years ago | Welcome. When you are providing comments on edits, please be more precise and not just say 'added stuff' but however you could for example say 'added buildings' and it is also recommended that you just do one country/area and not a few edits in Australia and a few in New Zealand. Once again, welcome to the OSM community. |
| 120416060 | over 3 years ago | Reverted Changset #120416060 as majority of railways with 'oneway=yes' allow 2 way travel of trains. Reverted changeset is #120464415 |
| 120455286 | over 3 years ago | What do you mean by "stuff all around the globe?" What sort of stuff did you change, etc? |
| 120413244 | over 3 years ago | Multiple railway sections you have tagged as "oneway=yes" should not be tagged this way. Trains can travel in both directions on many sections of the track. I have seen the map personally if they can travel in both directions but unable to find any copy of it anywhere on the internet. |
| 120414956 | over 3 years ago | Multiple railway sections you have tagged as "oneway=yes" should not be tagged this way. Trains can travel in both directions on many sections of the track. I have seen the map personally if they can travel in both directions but unable to find any copy of it anywhere on the internet. |
| 120416060 | over 3 years ago | Multiple railway sections you have tagged as "oneway=yes" should not be tagged this way. Trains can travel in both directions on many sections of the track. I have seen the map personally if they can travel in both directions but unable to find any copy of it anywhere on the internet. |
| 117284475 | over 3 years ago | I have fixed it. Made a mistake when editing the area. Edit in: changeset/120412574 |
| 120344373 | over 3 years ago | The edit was to remove an already incomplete u-turn relation that didn't do anything in terms of routing. If you are wanting to fix the restriction, just add it back in to reinstate the restriction |
| 118353582 | over 3 years ago | Do you have any intentions on adding on the 667 route Sunday service to Burpengary? It is shown as a route on the Translink website and Translink documents. |