Hi, no worries, making geographically big changesets is a "mistake" that happens every now and then, and it is not serious mistake :)

Thanks for adding these places like restaurants. It's not easy work, since it takes time to survey those. So I'm happy you're adding them!

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This changeset is geographically very large, spanning from greece to norway, which is not ideal. It looks like you used OsmAnd to edit the locations. OsmAnd uploads these changes as a collection only when you select "upload" there.

Also I noticed that the Eat Well and Herb Garder appear to be duplicates, but I took care of those.

See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ratikan-rakentuminen/125068

Moi,

Kumosin tämän changesetin osittain, yhden tiemuutoksen osalta. Norjasta Narvikin läheltä lähti maantien tunneli, niin palautin sen takaisin.

changeset/161717807

Moi,

En oikein keksi miten informal=yes sopisi taloyhtiön pihatiehen. Tuo ei ainakaan ilmakuvista katseltuna oikein vaikuta siltä.

Moi,

Mikä ajatus tässä informal=yes merkinnän poistossa on? Eikö se ole juuri oikea tagi tällaiselle oikopolulle, ns desire pathille?

Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! However I have few comments / concerns:

I think there's few problems with this changeset. First it's missing changeset comment, so I don't know what you intended to edit here.

Secondly, this changeset spans from norway across almost the entire russia. Ideally changesets should be local, a lot more local than this.

Third, there's bunch of nodes with no tags in them (and they're not part of a way). Such nodes serve no purpose, and shouldn't be added. Examples: 12385078560 and 12385078528

Large geographical size can happen if you accidentally upload some "old" data in JOSM - it happens to all of us sometimes!

For the nodes without any tags, you can try using some tools to find such nodes:

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159753427

Moi,

Ajattelin kysyä ja varmistaa että onko Huittisissa oikeasti vierekkäin kaksi "Lauttakylän evankelinen rukoushuone" nimistä taloa?

Toiseksi, olisi toivottavaa/suotavaa jakaa muutokset maantieteellisesti jokseenkin paikallisiin muutoskokoelmiin (changeset). Esim. tässä muutoskokoelmassa on muutoksia Forssassa, Huittisissa ja Voltissa niin sen olisi voinut jakaa kolmeen eri changesettiin. Tämä helpottaa muutosten katselmointia. Lisätietoa aiheesta: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hi! I don't think any of these are highway=residential. I changed these to foot paths and driveways instead.

I reverted part of this changeset where an underground tunnel in Minneapolis, USA was edited too.

changeset/158390491

Looks like you added some paths and parking way roads. Looks good. I think some of the service roads on the parking lot could be classed as parking aisles, and there's one bit where you have two ways on top of each other. Otherwise dood job!

(That's a funi shaped parkinglot, I wonder who came up with the shape)

Nice big bbox :)

Thanks for your comment! I didn't realize that by backside they would mean Frederika Runebergin katu but it makes sense to me now.

I moved the hotel node back (but I went ahead and put it inside the building, norm for amenities).

I also changed the road class from service to driveway. Driveway seems more accurate to me and some routers might avoid routing via service roads. (Altough I couldn't replicate the problem with routing, I tried dragging the destination node around the building and I had to be pretty far into the backsidan to get it to route via the other road.)

Hi,

I fixed the tagging according to how it's explained in the OSM wiki, which I linked in the bottom.

amenity=fire_station goes to the entire area of the amenity. This is just like school, college or hospital would be tagged. I used the existing area, which looks like the fenced area of the fire station yard. All other tags also go to the object with amenity= tag, so I moved address, name etc there.

building=fire_station goes to a building that is *constructed as* fire station. I added this tag to the building. But if old fire station would be converted to city depot or bar or whatever, the building=fire_station would still remain.

amenity=fire_station
building=fire_station

Puoltaisin kyllä myös yllä ehdotettua tapaa, että piirtää yhtenäisen talorivin yhdeksi residential-alueeksi, josta on kuitenkin eroteltu tiealue, puistot, metsiköt jne. Yleensä OSM:issa ei ole tarpeen tietää kiinteistörajoja, ja kuten yllä todettiin ei niiden lisääminen ole oikein suotavaa.

I moved to node to what looks like the main entrance. Hotel in the parking lot would indeed be a "budget" option.

Moi, kumosin muokkauksen tuon alueen osalta, palauttaen sen takaisin rakennustyömaaksi. Saa (ja kannattaa) korjata tarkemmin jos on parempaa tietoa, mutta on jo vähän turvallisuusmielessä hullunkurista jos rakennustyömaa on merkattu jalankulkualueeksi :)

changeset/158221420

Hello Helmchen42!

Please do use meaningful changeset comments. Leaving changeset comment field empty does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Yeah, some dates are indeed deleted, for example node/11277051091/history

Can you comment on these issues Helmchen42?

Hi, thanks for response eggie! I shared this at the OSM world discord and someone from there reported it to DWG. I was thinking to try one more contact (my previous CC comment) but sure there has been enough attempts by now...