You added a strangely circular footway=crossing: way/260331597

Fixed by @hesher in changeset/48466342

Hey Nativ, the route you added is strangely 90-degreish, and the bing Aerial photos show a slightly different path. Is it the same path?

Correction: when there was an already cycling=* tag present, I shouldn't have touched it.

Nevermind the last comment. If there's a footway=*, then it should be highway=footway.

My bulk edit wasn't perfect. some *=designated paths shouldn't have been changed.

way/475355240 is a suspiciously long crossing

Fixed in changeset/48466184

You marked two nodes with the same name. Is this a mistake or does "Adi Hakarmil" has two branches?

First node: node/4819279244

Second node: node/4769302121

Fixed tags in changeset/48466078

Fixed tags in changeset/48466078

Fixed tags in changeset/48466078

historic=citywalls appears to be the right tag here.

As for photos, you could always use Mapillary or OpenStreetCam to share them with all mappers
:)

Perhaps a more suitable tag would be: historic=castle

Hi. I don't think generic names like "פינת פיקניק" are needed.

I started with the buildings near the main street. I will gradually outline more buildings. If someone wants to help, contact me to avoid conflicts.

Fixed in changeset/48221618

It appears many people don't put the "cycling=yes" part. I wonder if it messes with nav apps. osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:footway%3Dcrossing#does_footway.3Dcrossing_imply_cycling.3Dyes.3F

It appears the convention for crossing is a way with "highway=footway, footway=crossing, cycling=yes", the crossing is terminated by two "highway=crossing" nodes at each side of the street.