more to be corrected after discussion in larger community

No it's OK thanks, only if you have the occasion to check. I thought you'd know already because you added the surface. If you ever find out but think it's too complicated for you to update all the route relations, you can contact me to make the update. it's relatively easy with JOSM editor.

I think also it should be only one road entrance. User EUmapper kept both when he changed it as living_street. The type of road fits i'd say, since it's a road allowed to low speed traffic and priority to pedestrians. Sometimes he makes mistakes so the double road is certainly wrong according our point of view + photos. I warned him several times about some of his errors but he never replied.
Thanks!

Hi! About the ways around here way/586993234 I see on Geoportail's 2020 photos there have been works for making the whole street more adapted for pedestrians, haven't the little footways disappeared actually then?

+ merged equal elements

+ new watering place

+ one tracktype updated

+ tags added/corrected on heath now scrub

+deleted obsolete elements

+ extended waterway

Groesteen*

+ new elements

In this changeset i noticed that you deleted a business which still exist node/2692257285 Website is still on:
http://www.bbt-chaud.com/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112490818

I think i've repaired the MP, apparently you only had removed the outer but the relation was still existing. Don't do anything

Also stop your irrelevant changeset description!

Hi! Stop all! You've broken the complex MP forest near Kayl! It has many inners which substract the areas not covered by trees! You have to correct it either by reverting your changesets or redo the MP (good luck)! As last time you haven't responded to my comment some time ago about the false positions of roads you had done, i will report you if you don't repair your damage.

This changeset seems the first one where the MP doesn't exist anymore.

Hi! Stop all! You've broken the complex MP forest near Kayl! It has many inners which substract the areas not covered by trees! You have to correct it either by reverting your changesets or redo the MP (good luck)! As last time you haven't responded to my comment some time ago about the false positions of roads you had done, i will report you if you don't repair your damage.

Thank you for the extra details! I did know of the facilities on the plateau but didn't know exactly which type of site. I made the changes.

typo correction: "in order to render on a map"*

Hi! Adding only the name as tag is useless. That tag is not machine readable in order to ender on a map. You rather need to add the relevant tag expressing the feature. By Felsencamp, i guess it's either a picnic site with several picnic structure with bbq, picnic tables, benches, grass areas... the tag is "tourism=picnic_site" or just a picnic table, then the tag would be leisure=picnic_table. With these tags you don't need to describe what the OSM element is in the name, which is considered in general a bad practice.

Salut! J'ai remarqué beaucoup de charcoal_piles qui ont été dupliqués par accident, ils sont à peine 1 ou 2m espacés Exemple: node/8544195431 J'en ai enlevé quelques uns mais il en reste encore certainement autour de cet exemple. Si tu veux bien m'aider à en enlever stp. ;)

Autre chose au sujet du tag barrier=ditch, ce tag est utilisé pour des structures de murs afin de bloquer le passage, généralement autour de fortifications. Ceux que tu as ajouté dans ce changeset et autres sont en fait des fossés pour délimiter les parcelles car le tracé correspond à celui des parcelles cadastrales sur WalOnMap. A mon avis, tu aurais confondu à cause du constraste du relief sur le LIDAR trop fort. Par exemple: way/920119693
vs
https://geoportail.wallonie.be/walonmap#SHARE=CE28B1925A6A4746E053D5AFA49D4FE6
Bien à toi,