If you have any questions about this new area of fort whyte I'm happy to help update the map. I've been there several times and made a bunch of updates already.

Thanks. I updated the map to what I saw when I visited (and what is in the aerial images).

The parking aisle that was removed in this changeset, I suspect you intended to break it into two pieces, not remove it? I visited and the parking aisle is still there like in the public aerial images, just needed to be broken in two pieces.

Did you intend to remove the name of the dog park? You can find that name on the city of winnipeg website, so it seems like it is correct.

I visited and confirmed the south portion is two way and the north portion is one way and I've made the edits to reflect that now.

Thanks for your reply. In the last screenshot you can see the lane markings on the road change from yellow to white. Yellow usually means a line separating two directions of traffic, white means a line separating two lanes of traffic going the same direction. So I think that is enough to conclude that the south part of the road is bidirectional if you want to make that edit please go ahead. Otherwise I will visit at some point in the future and come back and correct it.

I think this road is one way north of the service road that connects to staff parking, and two way south of that. I can visit to confirm but maybe you have access to street level imagery that can confirm?

Do you know what they are doing here?

bruce oake is on the aerial images now, so i did an update of that area. take a look and see if there is anything else to improve

Hi, thanks for your comment. The screenshot looks like it is taken from the parking lot outside of the gate. Yes, some of that area is a parking lot (people drive to this location, park in the parking lot, and then walk around in the exhibition area), and some of it is festival grounds. It's not entirely clear which part is which just from the aerial images. I understand why you made the edit, because it does look like a big parking lot from the satellite photos. And vehicles do go in there to setup/take down the fair, and at other times of the year during smaller events they may allow vehicles in a portion of it. But the main purpose is the fair exhibition. But I have visited the location many times, including after May 2025 and I can assure you that it's main purpose is walking/fair grounds and not parking.

I appreciate all your efforts in mapping things, I just wanted to fix up this one change and let you know why I was doing so.

Hi there, I reverted this in changeset/170826288 because this area is an exhibition area, think fair grounds. It's main use is as a walking area for the red river ex so it's not a parking lot/sevice roads etc

You can also add play grounds as areas if you wish.

This is definitely not a regular accessible road. I've put this back as construction even though there isn't any active construction. I'm open to better tags, but marking this a regular road is not correct.

No response so I'm going to revert this.

What makes this road residential? There is no residential here, just industrial.

You sure this was demolished? I was there recently, I think there is still a building there.

"as streets are not cut as expected"

I think you're expectation here is wrong. There is no reason to expect streets be "cut" at any specific point.

If your tool is getting confused by this, there are literally millions of other intersections that are like this, so how can your tool have any hope of working at all ever? Rather then find and change millions of intersections on osm, why not teach your tool to be a little smarter to understand this? Seems like the better path?

Surely there has to be millions of cases like this in OSM that your internal tool doesn't understand? So mutating them all on osm seems impractical vs just adding a bit more smarts to your tool seems more doable?

Why make this change at all? It doesn't change anything at all?

Thanks for noticing this! I visited to investigate. It looks like they had a concrete path at normal sidewalk width, and then later they added a second section of concrete the same width right beside it to double the width (one side of the concrete looks newer and recent). So it looks like it started looking like a normal sidewalk, hence the appearance in the aerial imagery, and then later they came back and widened it to make it a multi-use path. I will update the map to what I found on the ground.