Wikidata item for Martin's now created: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q116779207 , and pull request submitted to NSI: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/7775

If you disagree with any of the NSI pre-sets that are used in iD, then you can file issues at https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues . There was some previous discussion on this one at https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/1273 .

Yes, It's a "Martin's", hence the band=* tag. Rightly or wrongly, NSI has assigned brand:wikidata=Q16997477 to these as well. https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=newsagent&tt=martin%27s . It's not entirely wrong, since both fascia's are trading names of the same parent McColl's brand.

Personally, I'd like to see a separate brand:wikidata=* value for Martin's (it's already on my OSM To Do list), but it will need NSI to be updated as well, otherwise iD will be 'suggesting' everyone changes it back. At least with the brand=Martin's values set, it should be straightforward to change to a more specific brand:wikidata value when one is available (which is better than some previous NSI tagging decisions).

Can I check if way/230878776 has really changed from a Tesco Express to a Londis? It's odd, as there's another Londis store just next door at the Petrol station: node/10058580419 .

If way/230878776 is now a Londis, then the brand tags could do with being updated.

Many thanks. I think you're mapping is perfectly correct then. Though the paths on the ground don't agree with the official Public Rights of Way data.

Thanks for the very detailed changeset comment! Can I just check (if you can remember) whether there really are two parallel routes (the track and path) running NE from osm.org/?mlat=52.60698&mlon=1.40271#map=19/52.60698/1.40271 ?

According to Norfolk County Council's GIS data, Surlingham FP 12 should run SE alongside the residential property, and then meet Surlingham FP 10 at a T-junction at that point, where you can turn right or left. This isn't the geometry that's currently mapped.

I've been to have a look at the ground today. There are no signs on the ground for the Hereward Way round there, so I've routed the OSM relation along the riverside route that's used by the other Long Distance Trails, and most closely follows the PRoWs.

I'm not sure I'm afraid, but I'll try to take a look next time I'm out in that direction. From what I recall, the signing on the ground around there is somewhat patchy, so any route is probably a mix of interpolation and guess-work. The route would probably have supposed to follow the official Rights of Way: Lynford FP 6, then a bit of the U33346, and finally Lynford RB 7 (i.e. closer to the southern option). But the route of Lynford FP 6 doesn't exist on the ground. See https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/norfolk/breckland/lynford/ .

In this changeset it looks like you've added building outlines and address details for four lines of terraces on Redcliffe street.

However, I think the addr:street, addr:postcode and most (if not all) of the addr:housenumber tags you added are wrong. I've corrected the street name and postcode tags. But can you check on the numbers? All four blocks of terraces have the same set of numbers, which go 50-55 and then 42-55 again.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/126552904 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changeset/122550939 to restore outline polygons for each level of the House of Fraser store, consistent with other stores in the shopping centre.

Hi there! Could I check exactly what you did in this changeset and why?

As far as I recall, there were previously three separate polygons for the extent of the three different floors of the shop, and a relation relation/13877577/history to link them all together.

The different polygons are useful when viewing (e.g. in https://openlevelup.net/?l=0#18/52.62593/1.29031 ) or editing (e.g. in JOSM) the different layers of the shopping centre.

Setting aside the question of whether changing the representation to a single polygon is a good thing, it looks like in the process you've lost quite a bit of the data about the store that was tagged on the previous relation. The current single polygon way/108866054 is missing the previous telephone number, opening hours, FHRS IDs, and half of the address. Also the layer and level tags on the polygon are incorrect if it's now representing the whole store. If we are to keep the current representation, then the single polygon needs fixing.

Many thanks!

In this changeset you added "Fulton's Foods" tags to way/1052126162 , and a note saying it was under construction and yet to open.

Are you sure that this is (will be) a "Fulton's Foods" store? According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton%27s_Foods the stores were all closed earlier this year. So it would be odd if a new one was about to open.

In this changeset, the address on node/7428745680 was changed from 12 Park Lane Business Park, to 131b Middleton Boulevard, but the location of the node was not changed.

If the business has moved premises, then the node needs to be moved to reflect that. We can't have an address tagged in the wrong location!

Could you confirm where the Intelicle Ltd business is located now, and make sure the position of the node and its address are consistent?

The postcode of "PL31 1LZ" that you added to way/418919314 in this changeset is not correct for this location.

I wonder if the school that this is tagged as is actually still using this site. I don't suppose you can shed any light on this can you?

In this changeset you have added the address of "67, High Street, Ascot, SL5 7HP" to the two OSM objects way/1041134542 and way/986507087 .

The first of these is fine, as that's where the object is located. But for way/986507087 the way is actually located on West Street, Marlow.

Is there an additional branch/showroom at that location? If so, could you update the address elements to correct them? If not, then please could you remove the Hyperion Tiles details and the incorrect address from way/986507087 .

Many thanks!

Banking is a regulated industry in the UK. Rule changes that came in around 2019 meant that HSBC had to re-brand its UK retail banking operations, and chose to go with "HSBC UK". The re-branding of branch signage started in 2018, and as far as I know was completed several years ago.

So all UK HSBC branches should now be "HSBC UK", and that's the basis for this change. It would be very strange if this branch was still using plain "HSBC". Do you know what the date of the Bing Streetside imagery you checked is?

In this changeset it looks like you've updated the name of way/316688348 from "Currys PC World" to "Currys", and the name of way/26503665 from "PC World" to "Currys".

It would seem odd for there to be two Currys stores this close together. So is this change just based on a survey or local knowledge, or was it just based on the existing tagged names that we know are no longer in use?

I'm asking because there are Mapillary images from July 2020 that show the second of the above buildings as being a Dunelm store at that time: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=51.521835899972&lng=0.071302&pKey=957643231749948&focus=photo .

Do you have any more recent knowledge, or would updating the second "Currys" to "Dunelm" be the best option here, based on the available information?

This changeset was created by the StreetComplete app. It says you were doing the AddOpeningHours quest, but rather than add any opening hours, the edit has removed the amenity=restaurant, name=Giggling Squid, and other tags from the node node/289136763/history . Presumably, you said in the app that the place was permanently closed / no longer existed.

Looking at https://www.gigglingsquid.com/restaurant/bury-st-edmunds/ and https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1113999 it seems that the Giggling Squid restaurant may still be operating. So I'm wondering if were those tags removed by mistake? Do you know if the restaurant is still there?

In this changeset you added the node node/9201272428 for a "Matalan Clearance" store. It is right next to an already mapped "Matalan" store at node/3891425099 .

Do you know if there are two stores from the same company next to each other here, or should there just be one store?