Could I check if you intended to remove the shop=trade tag from way/374420094 in this changeset? If so, what the current status of this branch?

Hi pjdebruin,

It's a bit difficult to tell from the OSM history information, but am I right in thinking that in this changeset, you removed part of the path along the river at osm.org/?mlat=52.305605&mlon=0.654126#map=17/52.305605/0.654126 and diverted it around the sewage treatment works?

The official route of the Public Footpath follows the rive there. So did you move the path on OSM because the riverside path is no longer accessible? Do you recall if there any official 'diversion' or 'path closed' signs on the ground?

Best wishes,
Robert.

Do you mean is sells books as well, or that it's called "Oxfam Music and Books" or both?

In this mapillary image from August 2023 it seems that the store is branded as "Oxfam Music": https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17.66803903824338&lat=50.901953070091395&lng=-1.4041352117228598&pKey=1297102577591494&focus=photo also the store website https://www.oxfam.org.uk/shops/oxfam-music-shop-southampton/ says it's an "Oxfam Music" store.

If those two datapoints are still valid, perhaps it should be mapped as "Oxfam Music" but with shop=music;books and a note to explain?

I've just found https://knaptonvillage.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Norfolk-County-Council-Quiet-Lanes.pdf . Page 11 suggests the off-road sections should be "links" rather than "Quiet Lanes"...

That's odd with the "Quiet Lane" - do you think the sign was a mistake by the council?

But regardless of that, surely it should be public_footpath, not public_footway in the designations there.

Could you check the designation tags you gave to way/1308417774 and way/1308417778 in this changeset? I suspect they should both be just designation=public_footpath, but currently one has designation=public_footway and the other has designation=public_footway;quiet_lane . Many thanks!

Oh yes, definitely. The location of the node I added is correct. I'm not sure why I didn't notice the existing postbox node when I added it. I've removed the duplicate now. Thanks for spotting that.

Hi Dotty1973,

In this changeset and other one made around the same time, you added two AEDs to OpenStreetMap, a few metres apart with similar descriptions:

* node/12222114701
* node/12222088001

I assume that there is actually only one AED outside the funeral directors here. Could you confirm this, and remove whichever one is in the wrong location?

Many thanks!

Hi Dotty1973,

In this changeset you added an AED: node/12229455301 with the location description "red sky right hand side building through car park into park into ".

The description doesn't make much sense to me, and from aerial imagery the mapped location of the AED in OSM doesn't appear to coincide with a building.

Could you check the description and location in OSM, and make any necessary changes?

Many thanks,
Robert.

For changes like this, which come from manual inspection of a number of objects from UK-wide analysis, I'm not sure it's desirable of very efficient to split the changeset into any smaller regions.

Could I ask why a country-wide changeset like this causes problems for you?

I think the Benchmarx "branches" are often concessions within a Travis Perkins store. I see there's a Travis Perkins mapped on that Business Park, so the Benchmarx well be in there now.

Could you double-check if the Defib node/11491689005 that you edited in this changeset is actually located in the right place?

It would be unusual for an AED to be on a private house like this, and I can't see one there on recent Mapillary images: e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18&lat=55.80972809999997&lng=-3.201136799999972&pKey=291783910653273&focus=photo&x=0.4997069832836588&y=0.6173899694651247&zoom=0 .

Perhaps the location has been mistaken for the one at the village hall a few meters down the road: node/10568780515 ?

Hi stsquad. In this changeset, you added a convenience store with the name "Morrisons Fault". I've not come across this name before. Is this store here perhaps a "Morrisons Daily" instead?

Regarding way/1268417725 which was added in this changeset...

I've not come across "Morrisons Fault" before. Is this store perhaps a "Morrisons Daily" instead?

According to Essex County Council's PRoW GIS Data (which we can use in OSM under the OGL) it's a BOAT as far as the parish boundary. See https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/essex/epping-forest/nazeing/ . This is about as close as we can get to a definitive answer.

Hi Nathan,

Could I ask if there's a reason you removed the name="Dental Surgery" from node/11199404051 in this changeset? Do you have recent on-the-ground knowledge to support this change? Do you know what the name should be now?

Hi ZenPhil, in this changeset you added an AED node: node/12066607947/history . The "defibrillator:location" description says "By the entrance to the school on the street". However, the node is located not by the school, but outside a neighbouring multi-story car park.

So I'm wondering if you accidentally mis-located the node. Would you be able to check? Many thanks!

I don't have any strong recollections about that path. Looking at the tagging, it's likely I either continued an existing way and then split it, or copied all the tags from an existing way.

If the path only goes to the hotel, it's probably not a designated cycleway. Feel free to adjust the tags to whatever you think is most appropriate.

Hi phodgkin,

In this changeset you updated node/9122654096 from a Sainsbury's to a Tesco. Do you happen to know if it's a "Tesco" or a "Tesco Express" store?

Hi there,

In this changeset you changed this store from a regular "Tesco" superstore to a "Tesco Extra". Are you sure that's correct?

The Tesco website at https://www.tesco.com/store-locator/pontefract/market-street describes it as a "Superstore" not an "Extra", and there's no sign of the "Extra" branding on the Mapillary image at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17.718420770892266&lat=53.613033615039&lng=-1.353344465722671&dateFrom=2021-01-01&pKey=321458212722779&focus=photo (though granted that's from a few years ago).