Are you sure about the postcode of "NG1 2JP" on node/5051595384 ? The NG1 district is in the centre of Nottingham, about 10km away.

(Discrepancy found using http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/location-errors.cgi )

Did you make a mistake in the postcode for way/522940857 in this changeset? It currently has addr:postcode=RG8 98P. (The final three characters of a postcode should be a a number followed by two letters.)

Are you sure that that postcode on way/507103490 is correct? According to Code-Point Open "PH3 1LR" is located over 5km away at osm.org/?mlat=56.292446&mlon=-3.727127 .

In this changeset, the designation of way/376088001 was changed to "restricted_bridleway". This isn't a class of Public Right of Way, so should it be either "restricted_byway" or "public_bridleway"?

Are you sure the postcode you added on these houses is correct? According to Code-Point Open, WR3 8BA belongs to Gregorys Mill Street in Worcester, and the correct postcode for here would probably be WR14 3NJ. See http://oscompare.raggedred.net/?layers=BFFTFF&zoom=17&lat=52.10427&lon=-2.30696

There seems to be a mistake in the addr:postcode and addr:street tags introduced to way/514334703 in this changeset. They appear to belong to an address about 100km away! osm.org/?mlat=51.731777&mlon=-1.250386&zoom=16

Did you make a mistake here, as you seem to have set addr:postcode=3 on the way way/162890123/

Did you make a mistake with some of the postcodes in this changeset -- the following three houses have addr:postcode=JAJB

way/452146161
way/452146159
way/452146152

I think you've made a mistake with the postcode for way/500933961 -- maybe you were trying to use ctrl+v to paste, but accidentally only hit "v".

Could you check the postcode of "BN27 2AV" you gave for the car park at way/30272755/history in this changeset? According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postcodes_in_the_United_Kingdom#Validation you can't have a "V" in the second part, so presumably this postcode is incorrect. Where did you get it from?

In this changeset, you seem to have created a duplicate node to one of the postboxes, rather than editing the existing node:
node/4920963852 node/54535866

I presume this was unintentional (perhaps a bug in your editor) and there's actually only one box present.

It looks as if you added the postbox node/4741573657 in this changeset, but there is an existing oostbox node node/3741485701 a meter or so away. Are there actually two boxes at this location, as the OSM data now suggests?

Yes, I found a few schools without the address details on the amenity object and rightly or wrongly 'corrected' them. Then I realised someone had systmatically been adding the address details to the main building instead, so I didn't do any more. It would be good to work out which is preferred by mappers, or if both forms are to be encouraged.

Personally, I see the address as belonging to whole school rather than a specific building, even if you deliver post to a particular place in the site. Since the school comprises more than just the building I's say it's wrong to put the school name on the building. (Also for larger schools the individual buildings may well have their own names.)

FYI, in the UK there are over 13,000 schools with postcodes, equating to around 45% of the total. (Data from http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/ to nodes are not included in either count.)

I'm not sure exactly what you think is wrong here? Given the previously mapped path follows the desire line across the field, with some evidence of use from Bing imagery, I assume that the path on the ground indeed follows that route.

But this route does not follow the legal definitive line of the Right of Way. So I added that route as way/493393332 and tagged it as highway=no, as it's very unlikely to be a physical highway on the ground.

Would you prefer this situation is tagged differently somehow?

Thanks for adding your hotel to OpenStreetMap, but you appear to have put it in completely the wrong place -- in a field in a hamlet call Scotland in Lincolnshire: node/4830238477

Presumably the hotel is actually way/209502349 .

Perhaps you could delete the node you added in the wrong place, and edit the way above to add any additional information about the hotel.

I think something's gone wrong with your edit here to way/112289834/history -- should it just have been changed to landuse=farmland?

I wonder where they got the Public Footpath information from then. There's no sign of anything on the definitive map: http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/definitivemaps/TG10NE.pdf

Interesting. So what did/does the notice say?

Hi, I'm curious about the status of the ways such as way/481829976 that you marked as designation=public_footpath here.

AFAIK, the route of these isn't recorded by NCC on the Definitive Map as a Public Footpath. But do you have reason to believe that the Council is in error and it should be?

The address on node/4490141297 (2 Mill Farm Road, NE39 1NW) appears to correspond to a location somwhere near osm.org/?mlat=54.902593&mlon=-1.776433&zoom=16#map=16/54.9026/-1.7764&layers=N rather than the industrial area off the A694 where the node is currently positioned. Do you know if the details are correct?