As the changeset says, I was working from a previously uploaded GPS trace (not mine) but no doubt someone local can review - I'd suggest you add notes to that effect.

Cool. I'd suggest the talk-gb list rather than the wiki pages - OSM discussion generally doesn't happen on wiki pages in the way that it does in Wikipedia.

(I think I've done those already so it's probably ok)

cheers! :)

It's a bit more than a "recommendation", it's accepted practice for the past 10 years - if you think it should be changed then by all means do raise it on (say) the talk-gb list and see what people think, but just changing a few routes from their long-established status without notice will break (and indeed has broken) existing clients.

The convention in the UK is that NCN National Routes, Regional Routes and Local Routes do not have a NCN/RCN/LCN prefix. Other networks (Quietways, Cycle Superhighways, and cf also the National Byway) do. I wouldn't be averse to new network= tags for these networks (which is where the information really should be kept) and the recent sprouting of networks in London does make quite a strong case. But, again, you'd need to get community consensus on that, especially given that network values outside the usual ncn/rcn/lcn list are unlikely to be parsed by many existing clients.

Hi,
Great to see the work you've been putting in on editing cycle routes!
We don't tag the refs with 'RR' or 'NCN'. The ref should just be the number. The regional/national status is contained in the network= tag (i.e. 'rcn' or 'ncn').
cheers
Richard

Pas de probleme. :) J'ai "reverté" la relation. (C'est trop facile de faire les gaffes comme ci avec JOSM...)

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/60609678 where the changeset comment is: Revert accidental deletion

Hi Sigo - is there a reason why you've deleted the bike route relation? // Pourquoi avez-vous supprimé le relation La Régordane (véloroute V70)? relation/5247546/history

Richard

Great stuff. Always good to see more people plugging away at the task of fixing up the rural US so welcome on board :)

Hi Jim,

Great to see your edits!

You've (I presume accidentally) changed part of Big Oak Flat Road to be oneway here. I've removed the oneway=yes tag again but thought I'd let you know - you might want to check other edits to make sure you've not done the same thing anywhere else.

cheers
Richard

Hi - great to see the work you've done here!

Quick note on road tagging: you've changed some roads back from highway=unclassified to highway=residential. This isn't really appropriate - highway=residential is meant for roads which are predominantly access to housing areas, usually in towns/cities and often lined with housing. An entirely rural road like these is better tagged as highway=unclassified.

In particular, in the US, many minor roads were incorrectly imported as highway=residential (from the TIGER dataset) and correcting them is an ongoing challenge.

cheers
Richard

Hi and welcome to OSM! Unfortunately you've broken the map with this edit by changing roads and cycleways to footways. I've put them back to how they were before.

Just spotted this as well. The lake is currently not rendering because the multipolygon is broken. kh12, are you planning to look at this?

Ok, thanks. I'll remove the bicycle=no tags then in the absence of any other evidence. Thanks for all your edits :)

Ok, understood - are bikes actually banned though?

Hi - you've tagged TX 361 as forbidden to bicycles in this changeset. Is that really the case? (Seems a bit unusual given the nice wide shoulders but I thought I'd check!)

Hi - you appear to have changed the ref for the entirety of NCN 46 to "(46)" (with brackets) with this edit. I've changed it back.

> SABRE Wiki is the most factual website on the road network

It also doesn't expressly have an open licence. We can't copy information from it without that.

Looks great (just checked it on hiking.waymarkedtrails.org). Thank you.