Great stuff. Always good to see more people plugging away at the task of fixing up the rural US so welcome on board :)

Hi Jim,

Great to see your edits!

You've (I presume accidentally) changed part of Big Oak Flat Road to be oneway here. I've removed the oneway=yes tag again but thought I'd let you know - you might want to check other edits to make sure you've not done the same thing anywhere else.

cheers
Richard

Hi - great to see the work you've done here!

Quick note on road tagging: you've changed some roads back from highway=unclassified to highway=residential. This isn't really appropriate - highway=residential is meant for roads which are predominantly access to housing areas, usually in towns/cities and often lined with housing. An entirely rural road like these is better tagged as highway=unclassified.

In particular, in the US, many minor roads were incorrectly imported as highway=residential (from the TIGER dataset) and correcting them is an ongoing challenge.

cheers
Richard

Hi and welcome to OSM! Unfortunately you've broken the map with this edit by changing roads and cycleways to footways. I've put them back to how they were before.

Just spotted this as well. The lake is currently not rendering because the multipolygon is broken. kh12, are you planning to look at this?

Ok, thanks. I'll remove the bicycle=no tags then in the absence of any other evidence. Thanks for all your edits :)

Ok, understood - are bikes actually banned though?

Hi - you've tagged TX 361 as forbidden to bicycles in this changeset. Is that really the case? (Seems a bit unusual given the nice wide shoulders but I thought I'd check!)

Hi - you appear to have changed the ref for the entirety of NCN 46 to "(46)" (with brackets) with this edit. I've changed it back.

> SABRE Wiki is the most factual website on the road network

It also doesn't expressly have an open licence. We can't copy information from it without that.

Looks great (just checked it on hiking.waymarkedtrails.org). Thank you.

That would be great. Thank you both.

Velella - don't worry about it, JOSM makes it too easy to unintentionally make big changes to relations like this. Hope you're enjoying NZ.

Hi - any thoughts on this?

This isn't really a hill whose commonly accepted name is "pokemon holy trinty gym", is it?

Hi - great to see all the work you've been doing on the Wales Coast Path. Unfortunately you appear to have removed massive amounts of the path from the relation in this changeset, I'm afraid, and the result is that large chunks of the path in North Wales are no longer shown. Before this edit the relation had 400 members; afterwards it had 100. Could you investigate and reinstate the missing members, please? Thank you!

Pretty much - NCN 45 was originally 'braided' through Swindon with two possible routes; Sustrans has demoted one of them to a bracketed link route (as it has done in several places).

Any automated edits would have to follow the Automated Edits Code of Conduct (osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) - they're really not for the faint-hearted because it's very easy to screw things up. I wouldn't recommend it. But your editor may allow you to load shapefiles and to bring the geometries through to the map one-by-one, carefully making sure they're tagged correctly and that they join up with existing features where appropriate.

New Strava heatmap is great!

I've been using http://osm.cycle.travel/unreviewed.html to identify regularly cycled roads and then retagging as appropriate (assuming highway=unclassified is paved unless there's a surface tag present).

Road geometry is amazingly broken in WV though :(

Heh - you beat me to it by one day!

> it is impossible to determine which of the unusual values are actually bridges

That's a genuine issue, but one which would be better fixed by removing the not-actually-a-bridge values than by removing the actually-a-bridge values. ;)