Yes, I normally align the imagery to a main road befor stating to add features. I do wonder at times if the images are truly orthogonal.

Sorry missed that one. The nodes actually on the (double) tracks should be stop positions.

Which ones are incorrect? Why does the editor do them wrong?

trigpont
Thanks for fixing my mistakes.

The station tag is now in the label node/7989407332.

New England North is the connection between the ECML and the Stamford lines, including all the cross overs that allow trains to move between the two sets of tracks. It's a subset of the overall railway corridor north of Peterborough. Perhaps the best representation is to separate the ECML from the Stamford lines (two separate named railwy corridors) and then overlay them with New England North and Helpston.

Have a look in the Sectional Appendix for reference.

I've put them back. There's no replicate button - just copy and paste.

Sorry, I just copied the station building to create the standalone node. I've gone back and removed the extraneous tags from the building. Has that resolved the problem? (See changeste 91173767.)

Warwick Road was used as the starting point for charter trains using the steam locomotives and rolling stock based at Tyseley. These are suspended at the moment. It's not part of the WM network.

Sorry, my German is not good enough to comprehend the link. Are you saying the transit area realation should not be a member of the RB25 relations?

Sorry, I must have omitted changing the nodes on P1 & P3 to stop_positions.

The Stadler GTW 2/6s are trains, they are metre gauge derivatives of the standard gauge product used all over Europe.

Train = yes is put in by the editor. I thought this was a narrow gauge railway rather than a light railway? How is the distinction made?

If you have a station node then the other nodes should be stop_positions not halts.

I traced the track from the overhead imagary.

It's a diagramatic plan not an accurate map. I used it to tell me the platform numbers.

Which tags do you object to iD changing?

Sorry, I missed out making it a stop position.

Although, the example diagram does clearly show the station node positioned between the actual tracks, not where Dolný Hričov is currently shown.

Yes. Removing the spurious "Trainstation" made the two are identical.

railway:junction isn't an option in the editor. It's railway:switch. I moved the name to be the physical point where the tracks merge.

Sorry this is wrong - Bif de Sallau-Ouest is the next junction on...