OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
125699745 over 3 years ago

A little bit more information would be nice. What are you doing to the railway and what is the source of your information?

125537104 over 3 years ago

The changeset comment is wrong. This was a walking survey

125411551 over 3 years ago

Sorry but that would be impossible

124201596 over 3 years ago

Did you happen to see a postbox on your visit? There might be one in the area but it hasn't been added to OSM yet.

123179323 over 3 years ago

Hi,
Have you any local knowledge of this path?
Last time I checked it was all inaccessible

123055122 over 3 years ago

Nice work, map looks so much better with the land use completed

122569023 over 3 years ago

Hi, A little bit more information about what you are changing would be nice. Just typing "Plym" doesn't help people understand what you have done.
Thank you

121418079 over 3 years ago

OK, I've changed it to service road and track, I think that's more accurate to what the road is used for

121407002 over 3 years ago

Hi AntV,
You re-added PL6 242D at it's old location. I've moved it to it's new location but kept all the tags.

121418079 over 3 years ago

Can I ask why you changed this to path?
This is the only access to the fields for farm type vehicles.

121380554 over 3 years ago

I'm not sure Track is the right tag to use for a road like this

highway=track

120926665 over 3 years ago

stahp

120722416 over 3 years ago

Well I certainly didn't duplicate anything. I can't really see what happened if you've already fixed it. Perhaps a bug in iD or SC. I certainly split the way at many points and used iD to automatically add bridges

120521090 over 3 years ago

Because it makes life harder for everyone else. It's hard to monitor changes in a local area when the history is spammed by people making global changes, most of which are unnecessary anyway.

111479455 over 3 years ago

Hi PP,
There's a node (9105152268) with the name (Discesa a mare con scale alla fine) which I don't understand.
I've deleted the way because the path is permanently blocked and overgrown but not sure what to do with the node, it if has any meaning

120183067 over 3 years ago

This changeset has deleted footpaths that exist, including a set of steps that exists. The footpaths may not be public access, although there is no forbidding signage. This changeset should be reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120183067

120183171 over 3 years ago

You've deleted paths that do exist, including an entire staircase.
Whether they are legally public footpaths or not is irrelevant.

119432242 over 3 years ago

Hi BinkyBunny,
What source are you using? How do you know it's an ANPR camera?

119381866 over 3 years ago

Some of them could use the name and brand tags updating too eg
way/358637686

119318201 over 3 years ago

I was just interested in what you are doing and how you are doing it, I don't have a problem with any of your changes.
Any speed limits I have set were from a walking survey using StreetComplete as I go. SC puts the source information on the changeset. If you see any errors please let me know.