RVR002's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 92784164 | about 5 years ago | Probably best to leave them for now. It will make reverting simpler if someone decides to do that. |
| 92784164 | about 5 years ago | Hey eteb3, I looked into this and it seems like the changeset below removed or otherwise broke a bunch of pre existing land cover relations leaving behind those untagged ways. We repaired this one relation, but that entire changeset could need repairing or reverting. |
| 56367288 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Bernhard, Good catch on the streams. I went to go fix them but looks like you just did. Thanks! -Jeff |
| 55689626 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Peter, I definitely agree with you. Thanks for making the change. I improved the geometry a bit as well. -Jeff |
| 52049391 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Peter, This looks like a false connection to me. I have removed it. Thanks for letting us know. -Jeff |
| 52392246 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Peter, Thanks for the very detailed feedback. This sort of local knowledge is always valuable. The way only being clear in some of the imagery is suspicious and worth waiting on ground truthing. These all seem like reasonable changes to ensure the best experience of OSM users. -Jeff |
| 52053617 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Beddhist, I appreciate the feedback. Based on your ground truthing I downgraded the road to residential. I smoothed out the road geometry that you pointed along that unclassified road as well. Thanks,
|
| 56941985 | about 7 years ago | Thanks for the heads up Tom. I fixed that intersection. -Jeff |
| 58961202 | about 7 years ago | Hi Russ, To my eyes, it appears to me that that the road is paved up to around the middle village. Perhaps splitting it there and removing the unpaved tag before that would be more accurate. Let me know what you think. Thanks for the feedback,
|
| 61553853 | about 7 years ago | Hi Stephan, way/615994900 and 615994806 are connected. Do you mean merged? For the second comment, we train our editors to be cautious about making unclear connections to avoid adding incorrect data which may have been the cause here. However, way/615994782 is a clear enough connection so I've added it now. Thanks for the feedback!
|
| 59278258 | about 7 years ago | Hi Tom, You're absolutely right. I've updated the road. Thanks for the feedback,
|
| 55725630 | about 7 years ago | Hi Tom, I saw a couple extra nodes on way/559334435. Can you confirm that is what you are referring to? Thanks,
|
| 55780120 | about 7 years ago | Hi Tom, We will adjust the secondary road of course, but it was not aligned by us, we just connected to it. -Jeff |