Qwajo OSM's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161898057 | 11 months ago | This is not a proper way of mapping a bridge please. Kindly retify it please |
| 161720915 | 11 months ago | Boss why was the road named 'service'? Road names are supposed to be the actual road names given by the highway authorities or the locals. |
| 74405044 | about 1 year ago | Hello Mapper, Kindly rectify if these toilet edits are duplicates or they exist? thank you |
| 158028308 | about 1 year ago | Hello, kindly avoid mapping buildings with shared nodes. Thats data quality issue. Hold down 'Control' key to avoid nodes merging with each other. Thank you and keep mapping. |
| 155562765 | over 1 year ago | Be sure to add a comment on what you mapped/changed/modified in the changeset comments before uploading. Thanks
|
| 152386504 | over 1 year ago | Good mapping. Kindly press 'Q' to give buildings a perfect shape when done mapping and tagging them. Thanks and keep mapping |
| 151937707 | over 1 year ago | These are multiple buildings mapped as one. It doesn't give the right map of the area. Please verify that |
| 151915799 | over 1 year ago | I highly doubt if these are considered buildings. Since the imagary is a drone imagery, it may look like a building but take closer look at the surrounding and make your decisions again. |
| 148601590 | over 1 year ago | Since greater part of the building is in your task tile, be sure to map out the entire building at all times. The mapper mapping the next tile might not map it due to the smaller portion visible to them. Thank you for mapping |
| 64842544 | over 1 year ago | Hi Enock, We were mapping quarries at the time, and based on current imagery, I am sure land use has changed so we can reuse the digitization or delete them. Thank you |
| 145985114 | almost 2 years ago | Kindly note that buildings are not supposed to be sharing nodes like it was done here, i have seen that most of your buildings share nodes, such are most likely not a clear representation of features on the ground. Thank you |
| 144113989 | about 2 years ago | Have worked on it, thanks |
| 128491567 | over 2 years ago | Hello Hassan Binid, Kindly confirm if this amenity is present in real life, because it doesn't seem realistic to me. |
| 140380212 | over 2 years ago | Hello Liza Ayoo the great mapper, thanks for mapping. Take note that shape and size of buildings matter in terms of data quality in OSM. So kindly press Q to give buildings the perfect shape after mapping them. Thank you and keep mapping! |
| 140366668 | over 2 years ago | Hello 5_LrsTsl_5
|
| 138660337 | over 2 years ago | hrhino, single nodes that are tagged with the building tags are mostly flagged in OSM database. Thats why i changed them, but if you think they are considered important data, then it will be reverted. Thanks |
| 138427814 | over 2 years ago | Hi mapper, thanks for mapping but note that building digitisation should match the features being map. Hence mappings should take the shapes and sizes of the buildings on the imagery. Thanks and keep mapping and producing quality data |
| 138396267 | over 2 years ago | Hi Russ,can the point building should be transfered to the polygon building to do away with the building inside building error? |
| 137968396 | over 2 years ago | a good changeset comment is as important as the mapping being done. Good mapping but lets get the changeset comment right.
|
| 47943035 | over 2 years ago | Hello mapper, can you please enlignten me on these entrace, is it an entrace to the building or otherwise? |