OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
80556755 almost 6 years ago

Indeed the user was found as part of a network of users who, besides other mechanical edits, frequently delete the relations of larger landuse MPs.
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

80386313 almost 6 years ago

reverted in 81655360 where the comment is: IT: revert undiscussed mechanical edit in changeset/80386136 and changeset/80386313, see discussion there; preserving 3 new landuse tracings

80386313 almost 6 years ago

reverted in 81655360 where the comment is: IT: revert undiscussed mechanical edit in changeset/80386136 and changeset/80386313, see discussion there; preserving 3 new landuse tracings

81565962 almost 6 years ago

Restored, no explanation given why it could not be in one of the factory halls.

81557822 almost 6 years ago

No explanations given;
- chocolate node restored,
- hydro generator restored (could be underground in the dam)
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

81557822 almost 6 years ago

Why did you delete the generator node/3314209134 and why did you split the rivers?

81557822 almost 6 years ago

Hi,
what makes you think that the chocolate factory, the name of which you copied from the deleted node node/5849465234, indeed fills the whole area of
way/776816065
There could be several different companies within this area?

81563935 almost 6 years ago

This changeset has been fully reverted for the following reasons (DWG Ticket#2020022910000011):
- malicious deletion of river segment
- needless splitting of rivers
- removal of existing water bodies
- speculative landuse assignments and removals
- mechanical tag regression and removal of amenity tags
- armchair removals of small features such as barrier=wall tags

81611584 almost 6 years ago

DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

81565962 almost 6 years ago

Dear cuchufleta,
why did you delete the shop node/6571876052 ?

81550947 almost 6 years ago

Please do not remove amenity tags from research institutes.

68570993 almost 6 years ago

Why do you delete large landuse relations, without caring for the member ways, and without refining the landuse?

77223667 almost 6 years ago

You have deleted a house, that was drawn in 2018 and is visible in various aerial imagery, way/582303031
and replaced with a single building node
node/6986990648
to which you transferred the properties like levels, and the address.

What is the reason for this regression?

Repaired.

81610457 almost 6 years ago

correction: s/DE/US/

71160546 almost 6 years ago

Hi interdite,
you added the undocumented unusual tag "urbanized=yes" to all these residential landuses.
What does it mean?

81243225 almost 6 years ago

This CS has been reverted in 81607692 with the comment:
DE: revert unreasonable removal of amenity tags in #81243225

70696232 almost 6 years ago

edathy, you still owe us an explanation:
- what happened to the over 1400 deleted buildings?
- what is the source for the estimated 600 buildings that you updated with house numbers and addresses?

70867865 almost 6 years ago

"generic:landuse" repaired on two areas.

Where is the name for Way: Khouchar Khouribga (694153259) from?

74287018 almost 6 years ago

Hallo edathy,
mit der Löschung von relation/3158329 hast du keine Verbesserung geschaffen, vielmehr hast du die member-ways nicht beachtet und nur den Landuse gelöscht.
Repariert.

71221994 almost 6 years ago

Um nochmal auf das Problem zurückzukommen:
auch
way/85445942/history
Tischlerei Brauckhoff hast du grundlos gelöscht, die Firma arbeitet noch und hat sogar angebaut. Andere User haben das Gebäude neu zeichnen müssen.
Also, warum die Löschung?