This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see osm.org/user_blocks/2541

This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see osm.org/user_blocks/2541

This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see osm.org/user_blocks/2541

This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see osm.org/user_blocks/2541

Parts of Lake Victoria were destroyed here by accident, restored in
changeset/67105952

Dear Mr L genius,
apparently by accident, you have deleted the whole Lake Victoria!
It has been successfully restored.

However, be careful in future when you delete things.

I also noticed that you delete a lot of buildings, to draw them a bit differently afterwards.
Please don't do that. In OSM we prefer to make changes to the existing objects, preserving their edit history.

Lake restored in changeset/67105952

In this changeset, you abbreviate road names, such as from
"Oeste 3G" to "Oe3G". What is the reason for this? In OSM we prefer the full forms. Short forms can automatically created from ling forms, but not the other way round.

You were changing only roads that have not been touched by user chachafish; and I did not edit in this area.

Can you please give a reason why you changed the road to 'primary'?

User cartogram gave the following reason in v.15: "secondary to have a consistent classification on east/west route".

Hallo Nikbeat01,
ich kann mir nicht so recht vorstellen, dass das Haus "Kelllerband Grünheide" heisst?

Would you please not falsely claim that I "eliminated" any street name? I never did that.

Could you instead please explain the source of the street names and reference numbers you add?

Dear Ferchino83, thanks for your response and apologies.
The OSM database is used for lots of different applications, thus any changes should be true on the ground and not made for a particular device.
Thus, when a Garmin application has problems with the search function, this issue should be raised with Garmin or the software that converts the map data.
I have doubts that tagging an intersection node with junction=yes would change the search results in Garmin.
Another questions were the deleted traffic lights. Please do not delete any tags you might not understand.
Please give useful changeset comments, describing the intention for your edits, and reasons for any deletion.
Please name the sources when you change details like the names of the roads.

Dear Alex-a,
how do you know the value in the housenumber was wrong?
Why did you remove it instead of correcting it?

You changed the interconnecting road 428309815 from tertiary to residential. Why that?
What is the source of your name change?

What is the source of your name change?

You changed way/417730475 from tertiary to primary, which appears implausible to me. What is this change based on?
You also removed 6 traffic lights and added unnecessary junction=yes.

What is "E14a" you added to a road? It does not sound like a proper name?

What is "Oe1d" you added to a road? It does not sound like a proper name?

On way/423040075 and other, you added the name of a connecting road as the name of the roundabout. That is typically incorrect.

You massively added junction=yes without need.

Adding junction=yes in not necessary. Why are you doing it?

What is the source of the names you added?

Adding junction=yes in not necessary. Why are you doing it?