OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
66862006 almost 7 years ago

Can you please give a reason why you changed the road to 'primary'?

User cartogram gave the following reason in v.15: "secondary to have a consistent classification on east/west route".

65545825 almost 7 years ago

Hallo Nikbeat01,
ich kann mir nicht so recht vorstellen, dass das Haus "Kelllerband Grünheide" heisst?

66858191 almost 7 years ago

Would you please not falsely claim that I "eliminated" any street name? I never did that.

Could you instead please explain the source of the street names and reference numbers you add?

66661564 almost 7 years ago

Dear Ferchino83, thanks for your response and apologies.
The OSM database is used for lots of different applications, thus any changes should be true on the ground and not made for a particular device.
Thus, when a Garmin application has problems with the search function, this issue should be raised with Garmin or the software that converts the map data.
I have doubts that tagging an intersection node with junction=yes would change the search results in Garmin.
Another questions were the deleted traffic lights. Please do not delete any tags you might not understand.
Please give useful changeset comments, describing the intention for your edits, and reasons for any deletion.
Please name the sources when you change details like the names of the roads.

66799066 almost 7 years ago

Dear Alex-a,
how do you know the value in the housenumber was wrong?
Why did you remove it instead of correcting it?

66774707 almost 7 years ago

You changed the interconnecting road 428309815 from tertiary to residential. Why that?
What is the source of your name change?

66774750 almost 7 years ago

What is the source of your name change?

66775043 almost 7 years ago

You changed way/417730475 from tertiary to primary, which appears implausible to me. What is this change based on?
You also removed 6 traffic lights and added unnecessary junction=yes.

66775091 almost 7 years ago

What is "E14a" you added to a road? It does not sound like a proper name?

66775696 almost 7 years ago

What is "Oe1d" you added to a road? It does not sound like a proper name?

66776602 almost 7 years ago

On way/423040075 and other, you added the name of a connecting road as the name of the roundabout. That is typically incorrect.

You massively added junction=yes without need.

66776834 almost 7 years ago

Adding junction=yes in not necessary. Why are you doing it?

What is the source of the names you added?

66777488 almost 7 years ago

Adding junction=yes in not necessary. Why are you doing it?

66777615 almost 7 years ago

Why did you remove the traffic lights?

66775598 almost 7 years ago

Dear Ferchino83,
why did you change a small section of this road way/534851262 from secondary to primary?

On way/422446417, what does "E8l" mean and why did you remove the name?

What is the source of the names you added or changed?

66661564 almost 7 years ago

@chachafish - apologies, my mistake. Indeed I misread your examples as Ferchino83's excuse.

Meanwhile, the wiki has been clarified about junction=yes, that it is not meant for every junction.

66661564 almost 7 years ago

You were citing cases were 4 traffic lights are mapped on the 4 joining nodes.
I was asking why you _removed_ such nodes from the junction.

66661564 almost 7 years ago

Sorry I don't understand what a junction in Chicago has to do with the removal of traffic lights in this place here?

66661469 almost 7 years ago

Dear Ferchino83, you have removed a traffic signal from node/264527964 on Jan 14, and one day after another user repaired it, you removed it again, without explanation. Why are you doing this?

66661564 almost 7 years ago

Dear Ferchino83, why do you add "junction=yes" to junctions that do not have a name? This is not necessary.

In nodes 431368703 and 268906268 you removed the highway=traffic_signals. Why? OpenStreetCam images show that there are traffic lights.