Polarbear-repair's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 80083445 | almost 6 years ago | malicious deletion of existing buildings
|
| 80923776 | almost 6 years ago | - deletes way/21763053 just to draw it again in similar shape |
| 80086140 | almost 6 years ago | - maliciously deletes existing new buildings way/404450592 way/448332517
|
| 76766631 | almost 6 years ago | Hi pangoSE,
|
| 80815104 | almost 6 years ago | implausible landuse tagging; undocumented extrapolation from node to campus (repaired/reverted)
|
| 81149530 | almost 6 years ago | blunt mechanical removal of brand:wikipedia
|
| 80214298 | almost 6 years ago | CS was partially reverted,
|
| 69674507 | almost 6 years ago | Ja, nur nicht zufälligerweise sondern beabsichtigt.
|
| 76766631 | almost 6 years ago | Hi pangoSE, this gives the impression of a mechanical edit.
|
| 63661394 | almost 6 years ago | full revert in #82308503 where the comment is: ID: full revert of 63661394 which maliciously coastlines w/o refinement or replacement; and mechanically removed landuse; DWG Ticket#2020022910000011; |
| 67913815 | almost 6 years ago | ok, apparently replacing MP relations with simple polygons |
| 66567503 | almost 6 years ago | mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater plants;
|
| 66303835 | almost 6 years ago | mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater plants
|
| 63749933 | almost 6 years ago | mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater and power plants.
|
| 63661394 | almost 6 years ago | Mass deletion of coastline features w/o refinement or replacement;
|
| 63656281 | almost 6 years ago | Deletion of large landuse relation in comparison to very minor additions.
|
| 68930234 | almost 6 years ago | CS deletes existing building outlines.
|
| 68799050 | almost 6 years ago | mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater and power plants
|
| 80663791 | almost 6 years ago | ok, this CS appears to correctly substitute outer-way relations with simple polygons. |
| 80344877 | almost 6 years ago | This CS maliciously deleted a large river segment (because it was not detailed enough?)
|