6 storage tanks have been deleted without reason, still visible in all imagery.

Restored.

JP: partial revert of 80162510, reason: malicious deletion of buildings; deleting landuse/natural polygons w/o refinement, (some obvious correction contained in the revert)

reverted, reason:
removing natural=coastline tags from small islands (leaving them w/o object tag); deleting landuse/natural relations/polygons w/o refinement.

DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Apparently a mechanical removal of brand:wikipedia tags. Could you explain?

This CS maliciously deletes a building clearly visible in Bing as declared, as well as Maxar and Esri.
It maps 2 minor powerlines from assumption, not visible in Bing.
It mechanically erodes established research tagging as part of a sockpuppet network.
Repaired.

This cs changed a large landuse=grass to the unusual overlay=grass, already repaired by local user

partial revert of deleted landuse and natural polygons; trying to preserve useful edits.
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

JA: partial revert of 80879081 which deleted large landuses w/o refining, implausible landuse, unreasonable tag removal
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

#81658322: PA: partial revert of 81286572: revert the mechanical removal of amenity tags by sockpuppet network

This changeset has been partially reverted by #81657902 and #81657576, where the comments were:
- MX: partial revert of 81288846: revert the mechanical removal of man_made=works
- MX: partial revert of 81288846: revert the mechanical removal of amenity tags by sockpuppet network; restore deleted landuse

Some details had previously been fixed by local user in #81382818

Why did you delete the landuse=orchard way/66449889 ? I do see orchard in the aerial imagery, it just needs to be refined a bit.

Restored, refined.

Sorry I cannot understand these changes.
You delete 2 large Corine landuses (farmland, meadow) w/o refining them.
You delete a residential landuse from Corine,
you create a better one, and tag that again as source=corine 2006 ?

If the buildings were skewed, why did you delete them, instead of improving?

Indeed the user was found as part of a network of users who, besides other mechanical edits, frequently delete the relations of larger landuse MPs.
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

reverted in 81655360 where the comment is: IT: revert undiscussed mechanical edit in changeset/80386136 and changeset/80386313, see discussion there; preserving 3 new landuse tracings

reverted in 81655360 where the comment is: IT: revert undiscussed mechanical edit in changeset/80386136 and changeset/80386313, see discussion there; preserving 3 new landuse tracings

Restored, no explanation given why it could not be in one of the factory halls.

No explanations given;
- chocolate node restored,
- hydro generator restored (could be underground in the dam)
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Why did you delete the generator node/3314209134 and why did you split the rivers?

Hi,
what makes you think that the chocolate factory, the name of which you copied from the deleted node node/5849465234, indeed fills the whole area of
way/776816065
There could be several different companies within this area?