OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175332284 19 days ago

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

175332068 19 days ago

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

175331827 19 days ago

Hi,
I see that you requested a review. To answer your question: Roundabouts don't usually have names (unless they are big enough and have their own addresses) so it is correct not to use the name tag here. See junction=roundabout. You can even use noname = yes to signify that it really does not have a name. See noname=yes for that.
So I would in that case also remove the name = Knalhuttenweg tag from the western semi circle of the bike path.
Other than that, your change set was really good! Thank you and happy mapping!

175232627 22 days ago

No worries! It is quite a common mistake.

175216544 22 days ago

Hi,
I see that you requested a review. The changeset is very good, the level of detail on the building is great and you used a perfectly descriptive changeset comment.
When mapping buildings in iD editor, you can select a building and press Q. That will make all corners rectangular, which makes the mapping more precise.
Thanks and happy mapping!

175167120 23 days ago

Hello,
you requested a review. This changeset is in general very good. When mapping houses in ID, you can select a building and press Q, which will make the corners rectangular.

Happy mapping!

175153886 23 days ago

Hello,
thank you for your edit!
To make it easier for other mappers to immediately understand what you did, please take the time and write proper changeset comments.
Her is more info on that: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you!

167083955 24 days ago

Hello, I cant tell what natural = BRIDGE HO means on node/12880642514 (the power pole on that property). It seems like a copy and paste error but I am not sure, so I didnt want to just remove it. Can you please clarify it? It seems odd that natural would be used on a human made object.
Thanks!
Jonas

174877007 30 days ago

Feel free to look at way/234001304 when you miss it 😅

173568400 about 2 months ago

Hello,
Thank you for adding all those details!
Please note that natural=tree can only be used on individual nodes, not on areas or ways. I fixed this here and at the cementary a few days ago.

Thanks and happy mapping!

172511267 3 months ago

Guten Morgen,

War es beabsichtigt, die Tags für Bäume zum Weg way/165438136 hinzuzufügen? Ich verstehe nicht ganz, wie dieses Objekt gemeint ist.

Grundsätzlich sollte der Tag natural=tree nur auf einzelne nodes angewendet werden.

172281037 3 months ago

Hello Michael,
please read osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and reconsider the tags you use in the edits.
A tree with name=farm is not the right way to map anything. In addition, information like a property owners name is not suitable for openstreetmap.

Thank you and happy mapping!

171102292 4 months ago

Vespucci didn't close the changeset after I added the landcover in colorado because the api call timed out, so when I did the dog tag edit, it just added it to the same changeset.

170870768 4 months ago

Danke für den Hinweis, die hatte ich übersehen, weil sie nicht direkt an der Straße liegen. Werde ich gleich nachreichen!

169674848 5 months ago

Hello,
Thank you for your contribution! In the future, please make sure to use more descriptive changeset comments so people can more easily understand what you did.

Happy mapping!

165201196 8 months ago

Hello,
please make sure that you don't accidentally tag buildings with natural=tree. There have been several buildings with natural=tree tags. I fixed them all, don't worry.

Happy mapping!

164804166 8 months ago

Hello,
Thank you for adding all those details to the city center! Please make sure to tag treerow lines with natural=tree_row. Natural=tree is only used for single nodes, representing individual trees. So in this case, the nodes of the line should be tagged natural=tree, while the line itself should have natural=tree_row. I already fixed it here and near Dronning Louises Bro, where you added a tree row a few days ago, so just a heads up for future edits.

Thanks and happy mapping!

164763465 8 months ago

I already fixed it. I just wanted to tell you before you add more wrong dog permissions. Enjoy your walk!

164763465 8 months ago

Thank you for surveying this area! Please note that the correct tag for dog permissions is dog, not dogs.

Thanks and happy mapping!

164568625 9 months ago

There isn't a particularly good reason, other than that I used the stamdard add circle tool of my editor. I will simplify them in the future.