Paved footpaths are by default not for cyclists. The one in question is not owned or maintained by the county council, per their GIS.

bicycle=dismount is acceptable, but it is clearly a privately owned footpath on the Spire grounds. They probably don’t mind and I don’t doubt cyclists have used it (such as the one with life-threatening injuries after collision with bus/Mini yesterday).

Why did you mark the footpath from the shared pavement of Tollgate Way to Old Watton Road as permitted for bicycles? The flush tactile paving and island and lack of paint/signs indicates this is a footpath only.

How come public right of way has been blocked off? Or is there just an unlocked gate that you are meant to open? Really access=no?

Why add ' Village Sign' suffix to man_made village_sign name nodes? It’s not verifiable on ground.

Have supercharged my S there for free a couple of times. The view from within the showroom outwards past the glass frontage is worth a look too.

Oh, seems it is another of those Americanisms that have made it into OSM tagging convention. However, can see why I queried since only one letter transition away from what they are commonly referred to here. Thanks for the background info.

Also sure this reads number plates and isn’t just a basic traffic counter?

Typo ALNR?

Norfolk County Council often have phrase-like names for obscure things such as short footpath links that I tag using official_name key. However, those are from official source, so description/note probably best from OSM mapper point of view.

Perhaps replace name=[value] with description=value then.

Why the square brackets in name tag value?

The Aldeby village sign doesn’t have the text ‘Village Sign’ on it, so why did you change the name tag to that?

Great stuff.

Probably surface=bitmac if that is a footpath, a more specific type of asphalt.

There is that benefit I guess, but I just wish all the websites would update their logos and links for efficiency of user agent look-up. So long as the data is there all is good in some discoverable form, just as I've gotten used to sidewalk/soccer terms.

Weird how auto-correct is contact:x to contact:twitter, the old name, the auto-redirected domain, that is falling out of common use, and near totally in media broadcasts.

Why not highway=path and foot=yes, if these are not properly established routes? What is the surface?

Was the reference not amended to include suffix 'D'?

This is one of those exception cases I think as it is the main route from A47 to the village of North Pickenham itself - despite being narrow as is rather typical of most rural Norfolk roads. Many are tertiary grade, salted as priority routes, etc.