Pink Duck's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 119213269 | 5 months ago | Why did you mark the footpath from the shared pavement of Tollgate Way to Old Watton Road as permitted for bicycles? The flush tactile paving and island and lack of paint/signs indicates this is a footpath only. |
| 169194051 | 5 months ago | How come public right of way has been blocked off? Or is there just an unlocked gate that you are meant to open? Really access=no? |
| 164345097 | 6 months ago | Why add ' Village Sign' suffix to man_made village_sign name nodes? It’s not verifiable on ground. |
| 144404863 | 6 months ago | Have supercharged my S there for free a couple of times. The view from within the showroom outwards past the glass frontage is worth a look too. |
| 166841417 | 7 months ago | Oh, seems it is another of those Americanisms that have made it into OSM tagging convention. However, can see why I queried since only one letter transition away from what they are commonly referred to here. Thanks for the background info. |
| 166841417 | 7 months ago | Also sure this reads number plates and isn’t just a basic traffic counter? |
| 166841417 | 7 months ago | Typo ALNR? |
| 161999165 | 8 months ago | Norfolk County Council often have phrase-like names for obscure things such as short footpath links that I tag using official_name key. However, those are from official source, so description/note probably best from OSM mapper point of view. |
| 161999165 | 8 months ago | Perhaps replace name=[value] with description=value then. |
| 161999165 | 8 months ago | Why the square brackets in name tag value? |
| 163282201 | 10 months ago | The Aldeby village sign doesn’t have the text ‘Village Sign’ on it, so why did you change the name tag to that? |
| 161293672 | 11 months ago | Great stuff. |
| 161310821 | 11 months ago | Probably surface=bitmac if that is a footpath, a more specific type of asphalt. |
| 159907981 | about 1 year ago | There is that benefit I guess, but I just wish all the websites would update their logos and links for efficiency of user agent look-up. So long as the data is there all is good in some discoverable form, just as I've gotten used to sidewalk/soccer terms. |
| 159907981 | about 1 year ago | Weird how auto-correct is contact:x to contact:twitter, the old name, the auto-redirected domain, that is falling out of common use, and near totally in media broadcasts. |
| 159916408 | about 1 year ago | Why not highway=path and foot=yes, if these are not properly established routes? What is the surface? |
| 159579802 | about 1 year ago | Was the reference not amended to include suffix 'D'? |
| 159566619 | about 1 year ago | This is one of those exception cases I think as it is the main route from A47 to the village of North Pickenham itself - despite being narrow as is rather typical of most rural Norfolk roads. Many are tertiary grade, salted as priority routes, etc. |
| 159566619 | about 1 year ago | This is still a legal, council prioritised tertiary grade road - even if the maintenance of it is poor. Please consider reverting to tertiary. |
| 149706783 | about 1 year ago | Curious definition of dual. Implies two roads, parallel to each other. Both Department of Transport and Council Speed Awareness course instructor confirmed to me that on-slips are national single carriageway limit, up to the point that the grass separator ends and they become the dual carriageway road. Doesn’t stop everyone going faster than that of course. Official stance is that merging at 60 mph is closer and therefore safer to average traffic speed of lane 1. |