Disagree. Users should be free to tag whatever they want for new features. Now is clearly the time to switch to the correct brand name suffix. However, the Twitter.com redirect is only 302 Found for the moment. Once that becomes Permanent might be the time to do a mechanical edit.

Twitter.com changed to X.com on Friday. Twitter is dead, the key should be too.

Need to change sidewalk=no on the roads to sidewalk=separate if you are going to explicitly map footpath like this. There’s not really much need when the pavements directly adjoins the road itself.

Kettle Foods is actually owned by Valeo that bought out the Meat Snacks company. This site appears to be purely crisp manufacture.

It still says Kettle Foods on the main building exterior (along with colourful graphic of 12 crisp packets)

It was pad-locked when I surveyed the route on 21st Sept 2023, with locked=yes to indicate 'usually locked'. Having just checked back to photo the path actually deviates to the left of the vehicle gate and to the right of another left-most post. I have tweaked the mapping accordingly.

Not sure why Mapnik isn’t rendering name of building:part=department, but I think this should remain as is to avoid tagging for renderer.

If Unthank Road has a roundabout on it which joins with Unthank Road, why remove the name=Unthank Road from the roundabout?

I do subscribe to highway=path because the signs show equal use and the NCN just makes use of that off-road shared bit of pavement for connectivity. Just feels a bit biased to be picking highway=cycleway for a narrow pavement.

The signs from StreetView 2022 suggest shared-use pavement (highway=path used by JOSM for that).

Puzzling to see highway=cycleway and foot=designated + public_footpath together on FP 34. Surely the primary user of a public footpath are pedestrians?

The council has official road names for the roundabout polylines, such as "KETTS HILL", for what was previously named "Bishop Gate Road" in NE corner of A147.

What makes the section from Newmarket Road roundabout to Thickthorn Interchange not an expressway? No adjacent accessible properties, 40 mph, dual, pedestrian controlled crossing.

70 mph is the usual dual carriageway limit. The speed curtailment to 50 mph, the bus lane and the lanes narrowing to one before the at-grade junctions don’t make it feel like an expressway.

Love the plane outlines, great stuff :)

Per motorroad=*#United_Kingdom is this really an expressway? Pedestrians and cyclists are permitted, it’s only 50 mph not 70 mph.

“Notable Information: According to Department for Transport, dual carriageway on/off-slips are 60 mph NSL unless otherwise stated.”

See my profile for why this is wrong.

I have reported your edits as vandalism. Please stop damaging the map data.

Reviewed and removed.