Pieter Vander Vennet's Comments
| Post | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Mappers in Uusikaupunki | If you edit something with iD and then save, you get a list of communication channels of the local community. Try https://irc.openstreetmap.org/?chan=osm-fi and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=15 |
|
| `new-note` mode in iD | Hey, I have a small issue with the color code. Red for open notes and green for closed notes is not friendly for colorblind people; the small cross or checkmark help but I think they are not visible enough. That would make your work even better! Thanks for the very usefull addition though, as I’m not colorblind it is already very useful for me. |
|
| le lieu où j'habite | Bienvenue! Il y a beaucoup de mappeur dans la Belgique, vous pouvez nous trouvez sur https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org |
|
| Mappers in Uusikaupunki | Have a look at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=60.80916065&lon=21.41064225&layers=B0T |
|
| Will the DWG block us all one day? | DWG is doing a good job. I don’t think they block if they don’t have to; and newbies messing up often respond well on changeset comments. |
|
| On Sett Pavements | Hey Fernando, Thanks for bringing this proposal into my attention. I’ve chimed in as well. |
|
| On Sett Pavements | paving_pattern=* would indeed be better. However, then I’m still missing something to declare the type/size of the stone (e.g. square:50 instead of paving_stones:50, rectangular, …) It would also make the ‘top level’ -tag easier to use, as it has less options. I’m a fan. Let’s write a wiki proposal for this… Just finding time |
|
| On Sett Pavements | Consensus is mostly based on what I read on the wiki and wikipedia. Most mappers indeed don’t know all these different kinds of paving stone. For those, I would propose to add a tag “paving_stone:type” or something similar. This way, the ‘surface=paving_stones’ still makes a sturdy database. As I’m not an expert on paving_stones, I’d love a diary which explains the differences as well! |
|
| On Sett Pavements | Smoothness can be somewhat subjective. Smoothness ‘good’ might mean that it’s good to drive with a mountainbike, but not rollerskates. Or it might mean that the sett is freshly laid and still flat, whereas old sett tends to sink in the ground on parts… That’s why I decided map the very measurable patterns. And although I prefer the term sett over cobblestone, using cobblestone is still better than no information at allL. |
|
| Tweaking the OSM-And routing engine | Hey mygeomatic, This should be possible; introduce a parameter as described, and use |
|
| Tweaking the OSM-And routing engine | Hey, I have no experience with BRouter. Perhaps drop them an email and ask about it? Or perhaps just test it? Testing can be done relatively easily by hard blocking a road. Also, I have no clue on how to encode height differences. |
|
| Tweaking the OSM-And routing engine | I have no idea, I only tried this with OsmAnd, as that is what I use… |
|
| The only phone that doesn't like cobblestone | Hey @naoliv I’ve fixed the images! I knew they were broken, but it was late yesterday evening :p |