Peter3579's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Peter3579
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5035915 | Peter3579 | A gate (could be opened) with a sign saying "private property - there is no path" blocks the sendero de las Eras (in april 2025). |
|||
| 5035919 | Peter3579 | A gate (could be opened) with a sign saying "private property, do not enter, there is no public path" blocks the sendero de las Eras (in april 2025). |
|||
| 5036780 | Peter3579 | The correct name for node/790196536 El Pinar is Puntagorda. El Pinar is just a small area within Puntagorda. This makes node/303094896 redundant. |
|||
| 5036677 | Peter3579 | Please give the node/11619328094 El Pueblo its official name "Mazo". The town sign (when entering the village) says that this is Mazo. |
|||
| 5036036 | Peter3579 | The node El Pueblo (11619328091) should have the official name of the village: Tijarafe. El Pueblo might be kept as loc_name or as neighbourhood. On a large scale view the name Tijarafe should be displayed (as it is on every official map). |
|||
| 5036251 | Peter3579 | Please change the classification of the node/392274154 Santo Dominigo to village. It has a church, a shop and houses which already qualifies it as a village. With the current classification as "neighbourhood" the (incorrect) name Garafia is displayed at larger scale zoom levels. Administative areas should not interfere with the correct classification of sites. Santo Domingo is in fact the captial of the adminstrative area Villa de Garafia, but there is no inhabited site with the name Garafia. |
|||
| 5036959 | Peter3579 | El Fayal (node/877054157) is not a hamlet. It is an "area recreativa" and should therefore have the tag place=locality. |
|||
| 5035893 | Peter3579 | The ruta senderista (relation/6319344) is parallel to this path and is located approximately 20 m to the east. A fence prohibits commutation to/from the path. Only on the northern intersection you could commute. I have not seen "private property - do not enter" signs there, but had then big problems to leave the private area on its southern side due to a huge gate. |
|||
| 5035877 | Peter3579 | A high gate with automatic doors and a high wall on both sides blocks the path. The area north of the gate appears to be private property. This is a big problem when you inadvertently entered the private area from the backside (coming from way/425310620) |