OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
10104475 over 9 years ago

I was trying to update this with additional contact information (address, phone, website, etc), but I couldn't find anything through web searches. Is this doctor's office still in business?

33284218 over 9 years ago

node/38833433

33284218 over 9 years ago

You've changed railway=crossing to railway=level_crossing.

level_crossing is used for roads intersecting railways

crossing is used for footways intersecting railways

railway=level_crossing

railway=crossing

39432487 over 9 years ago

I've deleted the separate Ways with highway=cycleway along the road which already had cycleway=lane.
changeset/40216398

36711693 over 9 years ago

I've restored the street names
changeset/39717190

39432487 over 9 years ago

We don't put cycleways as separate objects if there is no physical separation (such as a bicycle lane that is painted on a road surface).
cycleway=*
In general, in OSM, we don't separate out lanes of a road if there is no traffic islands or other physical separators.
Note that in Portland on Southeast Division Street, appropriate cycleway tags already exist on the road, so these separate Ways with highway=cycleway should not be here.

39403848 over 9 years ago

There were some problems with the OpenStreetMap server within the last week where it would intermittently fail when requesting to download OSM data. You may have been running into that.

39375345 over 9 years ago

I've commented on https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/180

39403848 over 9 years ago

I've reverted this changeset in:
changeset/39442334
I normally don't want to revert things so quickly, but I'm also trying to fix up some errors that the MapBox data team has introduced around Portland and these changes added a bunch of new roads on top of existing roads.

39375345 over 9 years ago

I may need to revert this entire changeset.

39403848 over 9 years ago

You've added a bunch of roads on top of existing roads here. I'm not sure what you were trying to change, but I'm going to revert the changes.

36711693 over 9 years ago

I'm not sure what happened here, but you've changed a bunch of street names to "c", such as:
way/113766507/
I'm not familiar with the editor you are using "ArcGIS Editor for OpenStreetMap (10.2)".

29865510 over 9 years ago

I've updated it to be 12'6" (12 feet 6 inches). The original data as entered as 16"12', which was subsequently corrected to 16'12"

36035574 over 9 years ago

Ok, I've reverted in changeset/39047566
Many of the objects had been subsequently edited and I've resolved to the latest version and then backed out the addition of the "contact:" prefix on various key values that were added by this changeset.

28967957 over 9 years ago

building/apt/unit/suite numbers are put in addr:unit. I'm updating Sushi Track now.

36035574 over 9 years ago

Global search and replace is a bad idea. Was this change discussed anywhere prior to making it?

37790380 over 9 years ago

Thanks for cleaning this up.

8421895 over 9 years ago

I walked by here and I'm trying to figure out the nest way to map this. There is a barge close to the riverbank that stays permanently in place and supports the footbridge and may provide ancillary storage for the museum. Then there's the riverboat, which contains the museum. This is a working riverboat that takes 3-4 cruises per year. The rest of the time, it's either parked here or sometimes taken to dry dock for maintenance. Most tourist type maps of Portland show this museum and I think it makes sense to keep it in OSM.

I'm thinking maybe to remove the museum tag from the barge close to the riverbank since this is not really where the museum is and maybe adding a description to the riverboat noting that it is moored here for the vast majority of the time.

36704345 over 9 years ago

What exactly were you fixing with this roundabout?

Bus route 39 traverses portions of this roundabout and after this edit, the route relation for bus 39 from Hillsdale to Lewis & Clark College is no longer contiguous.

If you are doing extensive editing which involves splitting Ways, consider using JOSM instead of iD as if provides more complete support for Relations and will warn you when you introduce errors such as this into the data.

37678143 over 9 years ago

What's the intention of adding sidewalk_1=both where sidewalk=both already exists, such as: way/402292726 ?

I'm not sure what sidewalk_1 would actually be used for.