Ways 216965787 & 6136466 (Westgate) are not motorway links but tertiary. You'll notice from the map they don't ever join the motorway (intentionally) and, from the ground, are not under motorway regs either.

However, you do have West Street right (ways 6136477 & 6136478 & 34428523).

Everything else in this area OK.

It's a C-road (not sure of unpublished number) but note that it's restricted to buses/taxis/cycles/access for most of its length. Even the Loop Road is only C-class: relation/4148004

Agreed, destination:ref makes sense, however I would still contend that slip roads do have refs because, of course, the start-of-motorway sign (with number) is at the beginning of them. However, i will defer to agreed practice.

Thanks for the information.

The Headrow axis is not a B-road. It's not even open to all traffic.

Please map what's on the ground. Westgate/West Street running either side of the A58(M) aren't under motorway regs but do have primary route signage. That's why they were mapped as primary.

I can go and snap photos if you want evidence (I work about 2 mins' walk from Westgate) but you have this wrong, I'm afraid.

Sorry, armchair-mapped because I noticed A1508 was wrong number (should be A1058 of course; (M) part debatable). Having looked at the comments on changeset/56451569, feel free to revert it.

Having said that... check the changeset comments here: changeset/54852723

Yes, where they are missing, since slip roads take the parent motorway's number, and signage on the ground confirms this.

An exception is direct motorway-to-motorway links where it's ambiguous.

I meant street lighting :(

I don't know what your exact aims are, so forgive my question, but can you not use relations to better organise the waterways? Example of my own here: relation/7851221

A big thank you for tidying up the stands at the bus station - they were a bit messy before and I'd been meaning to fix them for ages.

I used to live close by but moved away a couple of years ago. However, it looks about right from memory. Nice mapping!

This changeset should be reverted immediately as it contains numerous examples of vandalism:
way/535487628
way/535487632
way/535487635

Hi,
I thought you'd like to know it looks like you've clipped a building with the footpath you've mapped.

(way/179457250 refers.)

Thanks.

Regards,
Paul

Thanks, I was just about to fix this myself. See changset comments here: changeset/47688939

Fixed on changeset #49126700.

OK, that makes sense.

Hello. Should the route_master include the path of the Woolwich Ferry (relation #392885) or not?

Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks a though you've mapped an area instead of a point of interest (ie office) for your company. Could you please map this correctly. I'll revisit this in 7 days. Let me know if you need any help in the meantime.

Regards,
Paul Berry

A survey today showed "Moldgreen Liberal Club" is spelt as such.