Pan's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 131254152 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for bringing that up. I haf made a typo and now have corrected it. |
| 140837427 | about 2 years ago | What is the Dingerie? Is it really a religious object? |
| 143804328 | about 2 years ago | Wrong changeset comment. It should be : Trient, landuses |
| 141631348 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for the tip. From now on, I will do just like you for the link in the changeset, it is a good idea. However, when I browse the data in JOSM, I don't see the changeset comment and the source is useful to compare the data with other sources. |
| 141631348 | about 2 years ago | La source est sur chaque bâtiment si jamais. Bon week end aussi! |
| 141631348 | about 2 years ago | Swiss topo 2023 et GWR de Simon. |
| 141555620 | about 2 years ago | We dont know if they are individual trees or not and there is absolutely no reason not to draw the surface of of foliage even if we know where the trunk is located. Destroying someone's work is absolutely unacceptable. I am reverting your damage. |
| 141410402 | about 2 years ago | This is simply not the case, nothing is arbitrary and you have vandalized the data. |
| 141410402 | over 2 years ago | It would would be less time consuming but less accurate. An other possible solution would be to reconsider the "low density" forest tag discussed on the forum. Given the accuracy of the Swiss Surface Layer however, this way is the most ground truth compliant. |
| 141410402 | over 2 years ago | It is impossible to me to see if they are individual trees or not according to the imagery. So, I don't know. |
| 140446568 | over 2 years ago | Is the viewpoint really in the lake? |
| 140149289 | over 2 years ago | Indeed, I was. Please accept my apologies. |
| 140149289 | over 2 years ago | Please stop vandalizing openstreetmap. |
| 128410025 | over 2 years ago | A lot of these buildings are not buildings. Beaucoup de ces bâtiments ne sont pas des bâtiments. |
| 136922168 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for your message. I suspect a mistake from my part. I would need to look at it but I suppose that my intention was to make a building relation with all the part and made some mistakes. |
| 129300636 | over 2 years ago | Danke. Ich werde probieren, das Tool zu brauchen. |
| 20804707 | over 2 years ago | Malheureusement non. Il faut que quelqu'un y remonte. |
| 129926012 | almost 3 years ago | Aha! Je n'avais pas compris qu'il s'agissait d'un avant-toit. Le bâtiment est donc désormais une très bonne approximation de la réalité. Le système OSM 3D est ceci très démodé et peu pratique. Bravo encore en tous cas. |
| 129926012 | almost 3 years ago | Bravo et merci pour les conseils! As-tu pu mesurer le bâtiment? Je n'avais que les photos aériennes et ma mémoire pour essayer de documenter le manoir. En tous cas, on dirait que c'est réussi (à par l'avant-toit sur la rue pour le moment). Bravo encore! |
| 129926012 | almost 3 years ago | Merci pour le boulot! Ce segment fait 64.07 dans le sens sud-nord et 244.07 dans le sens nord - sud. J'espère que ça aide. Je viens du Chablais mais j'habite en Asie en ce moment et je n'ai pas souvent l'occasion de vérifier sur place. |