OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
131254152 about 2 years ago

Thanks for bringing that up. I haf made a typo and now have corrected it.

140837427 about 2 years ago

What is the Dingerie? Is it really a religious object?

143804328 about 2 years ago

Wrong changeset comment. It should be : Trient, landuses

141631348 about 2 years ago

Thanks for the tip. From now on, I will do just like you for the link in the changeset, it is a good idea. However, when I browse the data in JOSM, I don't see the changeset comment and the source is useful to compare the data with other sources.

141631348 about 2 years ago

La source est sur chaque bâtiment si jamais. Bon week end aussi!

141631348 about 2 years ago

Swiss topo 2023 et GWR de Simon.

141555620 about 2 years ago

We dont know if they are individual trees or not and there is absolutely no reason not to draw the surface of of foliage even if we know where the trunk is located. Destroying someone's work is absolutely unacceptable. I am reverting your damage.

141410402 about 2 years ago

This is simply not the case, nothing is arbitrary and you have vandalized the data.

141410402 over 2 years ago

It would would be less time consuming but less accurate. An other possible solution would be to reconsider the "low density" forest tag discussed on the forum. Given the accuracy of the Swiss Surface Layer however, this way is the most ground truth compliant.

141410402 over 2 years ago

It is impossible to me to see if they are individual trees or not according to the imagery. So, I don't know.

140446568 over 2 years ago

Is the viewpoint really in the lake?

140149289 over 2 years ago

Indeed, I was. Please accept my apologies.

140149289 over 2 years ago

Please stop vandalizing openstreetmap.

128410025 over 2 years ago

A lot of these buildings are not buildings.

Beaucoup de ces bâtiments ne sont pas des bâtiments.

136922168 over 2 years ago

Thanks for your message. I suspect a mistake from my part. I would need to look at it but I suppose that my intention was to make a building relation with all the part and made some mistakes.

129300636 over 2 years ago

Danke. Ich werde probieren, das Tool zu brauchen.

20804707 over 2 years ago

Malheureusement non. Il faut que quelqu'un y remonte.

129926012 almost 3 years ago

Aha! Je n'avais pas compris qu'il s'agissait d'un avant-toit. Le bâtiment est donc désormais une très bonne approximation de la réalité. Le système OSM 3D est ceci très démodé et peu pratique. Bravo encore en tous cas.

129926012 almost 3 years ago

Bravo et merci pour les conseils!

As-tu pu mesurer le bâtiment? Je n'avais que les photos aériennes et ma mémoire pour essayer de documenter le manoir. En tous cas, on dirait que c'est réussi (à par l'avant-toit sur la rue pour le moment).

Bravo encore!

129926012 almost 3 years ago

Merci pour le boulot!

Ce segment fait 64.07 dans le sens sud-nord et 244.07 dans le sens nord - sud. J'espère que ça aide. Je viens du Chablais mais j'habite en Asie en ce moment et je n'ai pas souvent l'occasion de vérifier sur place.