1. Road has been renovated and upgraded in recent years. Is an important connection too. In comparison with other roads in the country, it matches a Primary Road qualification. Have driven it last Saturday.

    Closed
    #95899098 0 3 0 0

  2. Added tags to the feature to better show on the map

    Closed
    #95230726 0 1 0 0

  3. Important that area and name show on the map.

    Closed
    #95183896 0 1 0 0

  4. Reversing my previous change, as street signs are in previous spelling still.

    Closed
    #95183744 0 2 0 0

  5. Name corrected to current spelling

    Closed
    #95121937 0 2 0 0

  6. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94801166 0 1 0 0

  7. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94801140 0 1 0 0

  8. Redefined as a neighbourhood for practical representation for general public.

    Closed
    #94801087 1 2 0 0

  9. Redefined as a neighbourhood for practical representation for general public.

    Closed
    #94801027 0 2 0 0

  10. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800894 0 1 0 0

  11. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800875 0 2 0 0

  12. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800823 0 1 0 0

  13. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800454 0 1 0 0

  14. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800425 0 1 0 0

  15. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800395 0 1 0 0

  16. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800345 0 1 0 0

  17. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800250 0 4 0 0

  18. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94800085 0 2 0 0

  19. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94799959 0 2 0 0

  20. It is a planological zone, neither an administrative area, nor a neighbourhood. The construct remains incorrect in the OSM paradigm.

    Closed
    #94799891 0 1 0 0