Exacto. Imprecisões. O problema aqui está na edição do utilizador que removeu um dos nomes. Vou fazer revert à edição que mudou o nome.

it never had that name. reverted

@topolusitania a igreja não se chama Igreja de Santa Maria Maior. Petence é à paróquia de Santa Maria Maior. a edição do utilizador removeu o nome correto "Igreja do Socorro" e substituiu por este incorreto. Mesmo que se admita o nome que colocou, nunca deveria ter removido o outro. Este utilizador tem mudado nomes sem os fundamentar, quando já solicitei que os fundamente. Exemplo o Jardim Municipal do Funchal, que colocou como sendo "Jardim de São Francisco", quando não se chama assim, nem nunca teve esse nome. Aguardo que o utilizador fundamente, caso contrário as edições serão revertidas.

i will give you more 24 hours to reply and justify the changesets i questioned three days ago. If no reply, i will have to revert your edits

again, asking you why did you add this? this was shut down in 2015.

why did you change the name?

Again, why did you change the name?

hello, you change this name based on?

Its the second time you indirectly question my impartiality. Its not my Telegram group, its OSM Portugal and allow me to disagree with you as it was probably the best thing that happened in the last year regarding our portuguese community, to share, organize and discuss OSM related matters. It is not a closed source channel as anyone can join. And again, you keep pointing to different directions than the source of all this discussion, the two changesets that deleted 1100 elements in the map. And this will be the last time you will hear from me, as i'm not wasting any more of my time with this irrational, non-objective and lack of respect for OSM guidelines.

You are free to search for what I done over the years, I don't hide behind alias like you do. About the edits, I already told you several times to edit. Not delete. You keep ignoring that and pushing irrational arguments. Your ovrrmspping argument is pointless. Now have fun o your irrational talk because I'm not here to someone hiding being a nickname, questioning my integrity and my efforts over the years for OSM.
have fun and feel free to reply on Telegram instead of ignoring.

It's written on the wiki, so it's not like a secret like you make it look like. I see you don't reply on Telegram, but you are reading, funny. Again as I said, give him time to fix. The first thing is the mass deletion you done. That's not how to proceed.

Good, that makes perfect sense, like this changeset is private. Also regarding Telegram, might be worth getting out of the group then, if you don't reply there.

dont see the point of having that there, especially when you dont reply on Telegram group. But you are free to do as you wish.

o que é que não existe?

That argument about single trees being mapped as landuse its ridiculous. If you have detailed data why would you make it generic? It's the other way around, not the way you suggested.

On the swamps, what i see is wetland, which can be seasonal as you can read on the wiki. natural=wetland

About the "fictional" elements, you should have wrote that in the changeset where you deleted thousands of elements at once. SEO spamming, as i mentioned, if you do not agree with certain elements, you edit them and mentioned that in the changeset comment, not just blatantly delete >500 elements.

About the UI, im sure you are aware you can make or use other map layouts. Which you can cartographically represent only certain elements. Following your mindset we should delete indoor mapping, because its not rendered.

About your multiple account, which i can't verify since i cannot guess who you are as you don't mention other usernames. i have a transparent policy. i don't hide under different alias.

Regarding the Map Masters as you can see its not my team, but HERE. And to be honest i don't see the relevant fact of that being mentioned in this discussion as you clearly deleted thousands of elements, when in your point of view you dont agree with some. That's not how we behave on OSM.

Also, can you pinpoint where there's elements without tags?

Hi,

Feel free to escalate to DWG.

I dont see any mentiond of micromapping being unwanted as you state. osm.wiki/Micromapping
Following that logic we should delete all micromapping and indoor mapping because the areas around it arent mapped at that level of detail. That makes no sense.

Regarding my revert, feel free to fix, not just delete the data like you did before.
From checking your profile, i can see that 20% of your edits are deletions, which im quite sure if i inspect (judging by the two changesets i reverted) that are incorrect deletions.

The question is not my revert, the question is your changeset that deleted, which shouldnt be deleted in the first place. Thats the reason for this mess, not my revert. Feel free to edit and tagging.

Regarding you accusation of OzFlor being a member of my Map Masters Portugal, i do not own any team.

You are giving justification for 10 elements, but you deleted over 1000 elements on both changesets. Both of them have been reverted. Do not delete elements

Hi, i assume you read the guidelines, you shouldnt delete elements. About the public access to certain elements, you can add the tag access, not simply remove them from the map like you did.
The data has been restored

novamente, você eliminou informação sem motivo aparente. edição revertida