NunoCaldeira's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 62199947 | over 7 years ago | this users needs to be ban. in 30 hours he done 156 changesets. if you compare the edits, its a mess, hes deleting multipolygon relations into simple "building=stadium" and then addin a pitch (which becomes hidden due to the lack of building inner). All his edits need to be reverted asap. |
| 62231536 | over 7 years ago | yes, but it shouldn't be tagged as dam |
| 62231536 | over 7 years ago | hi, noticed you deleted a couple of upstreams of the levadas. please do not delete as these are reference points to users that do canyoning so that they know where they can get in or out of the canyon. please revert |
| 62199947 | over 7 years ago | Also read building=stadium make sure about the "relations" before editing,or else you are destroying detailed info |
| 62199947 | over 7 years ago | You can read about 3D tagging schemes here osm.wiki/wiki/3D_tagging
|
| 62199947 | over 7 years ago | inspected your account you are a user with 2 months old with 2000 edits. and you deleted 12000 elements! agaim, DO NOT DELETE elements ( 30% of your edits are deletes), DO NOT delete elements. will keep an eye, if not, will have to report your acount. if you have naydoubts on how to proceed, please ask to advise you. you are doing more arm than good to the map. Keep in mind most of these stadiums have 3D data in their elements for 3D view, and you are deleting them. |
| 62199947 | over 7 years ago | please be careful with your edits, you destroyed valuable information. you shouldn't delete elements like the pitch, gates. you added the ceiling as building structure destroying the 3D elements, which is incorrect. changeset will be reverted |
| 62017739 | over 7 years ago | hello, elements should not be deleted and redone like you done with the building "Galerias 5 de Outubro". you must edit the current one. Also keep in mind that the satellite imagery has an offset, and you misaligned the building. Will revert your changeset. |
| 61959196 | over 7 years ago | i dont see a single word describing that as a park. you are mixing the concepts of landuse with public parks (thats what the park tag is for).
|
| 61959818 | over 7 years ago | Again this is not a park. i will ahve to report you as a pokemon Go user. Adding fake parks is not allowed in OpenStreetMap |
| 61959196 | over 7 years ago | As i said, you changed grass to park. which is inaccurate. What you should have done is leave grass and then add another tag. not change more detailed info and adding less like you did landuse=grass
|
| 61959934 | over 7 years ago | you changed a churchyard to park, which doesn't apply.
|
| 61959196 | over 7 years ago | please read the definition of park leisure=park |
| 61958878 | over 7 years ago | also this is a bad edit, please read this. osm.wiki/True_Offset_Process
|
| 61959196 | over 7 years ago | also near Praça do Povo, that is not a park, its grass. please be careful when you edit, do avoid deleting quality data and adding bad data. will revert this changeset |
| 61959196 | over 7 years ago | why did you delete the fence at the park of Santa Luzia? Theres a fence surrounding the park doesnt it? |
| 55871238 | over 7 years ago | whats the source for this? |
| 61268689 | over 7 years ago | Boa tarde Feliz,
Cumprimentos, Nuno Caldeira |
| 61236877 | over 7 years ago | Boa tarde João, nesta sua edição, na realidade fez o oposto do que você pretendia. Os eixos de via estavam alinhados e você desalinho-os. Vou ter de reverter esta sua edição pois é danosa. Recomendo vivamente que leia estes dois artigos antes da próxima edição que faça:
osm.wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas e Qualquer questão entre em contacto, que terei todo o gosto em ajudar. Cumprimentos, Nuno Caldeira |
| 56908272 | over 7 years ago | whats the source for this name? |