again, on this edit you deleted the oldest element and done a new one. this is not the procedure in OpenstreetMap. Always maintain the oldest element. i hope you justify your edits before your next edit or i will start reverting these damage edits

im still waiting for your reply regarding your changeset from two days ago. also on this edit you added a levada as a ditch, a levada is a canal.

hello, can you explain why you added 4 drinking waters in such short distance?

hi Daniel, you removed the tag "canal" from the levada. can you please fix. thanks

Hugo, podes ver o Telegram sff. sobre este conjunto de alterações, continuo a pedir o fundamento para tal. Não me parece que isto faça sentido algum pelos exemplos que demonstrei no grupo do telegram

This is your edit https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/693511862

hello, can you explain why you deleted the history of the stream "Ribeira da Madalena"? that element was added several years ago and it vanished after your edit today.
Last changeset before your edit: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69583995/

Element history https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/93126528

seems you moved the stream north as a small segment and redraw the element as a new one.

Please explain your procedure.

revertido

reverted

Volto a pedir que justifique estas edições. Caso contrário será revertido.

and about me thinking that you called the map horrible. Here's two quotes from you stating so:
"I wish you good luke to deal with this HORRIBLE map" and "I'm sorry if I modified the map wrongly but the map is horrible in madere". Not my interpretation, that's your exact words.

again, you did not check the keys on those roads where you incorrectly added blocks, that do not exist. I'm not editing an incorrect edit, that makes no sense. You done more damage than good, i explained that and the lack of offset adjustment and all of a sudden, without reason you are playing the victim and accusing me of being xenophobic. Again, there's no such thing as "geometrical aberration". Respect local knowledge and stop being arrogant.

First of all, i didn't call you a noob. You need to respect local knowledge without taking for grant that you are a guru and start wrongly editing and adding incorrect data. I mentioned you did not align satellite imagery. And by your reaction i see you are aware of it, but none the less, decided to misalign the data. This is only satellite imagery, we do not have ortophotos from planes. There's no geometrical aberration on the data, only on the imagery. Actually there's is plenty of reference data to take. Again, thank you for classifying OpenStreetMap as "horrible". I have no issues with foreigners, you just seem to ditch local knowledge over arm-chair mapping, when its the other way around.

you need to calm down. i didn't erase, i reverted as explained on the previous changeset. As said on that changeset you misaligned the data, because you didn't align the satellite imagery offset. Your edits on Santana, which only the values were kept as the geometry were all misaligned have been added to OSM.

partially reverted

Viva, pode explicar a razão de ter adicionado bancos como áreas? a geometria correta para bancos são pontos e não áreas.
Mais o reservatório do Monte não é de todo natural mas manmade.
A ilha de tráfego do estacionamento do Monte também não é um park.

Aguardo justificações

About your opinion "the map is horrible in madere" it's quite disrespectful towards the contributors as the map contains high quality data that you won't find in other map.

Reverted

hello, can you explain why you added block on the old ER 101 between São Vicente and Porto Moniz? there's a permissive access on those via chain. I also advice you to read about the satellite imagery offset, the edit you done on this changeset in Ribeira Brava is completely wrong. You actually misaligned the data, not correct it

hi Daniel, for the levada you should use the tag waterway=canal and usage=irrigation