thank you, fixed it

I have changed the one "no" to "none". And edited the wiki to clarify that it should be "none". We use the same for e.g., maxspeed.

I do not use it as a source for edits. This was just one of several sites mentioning this motorhome/parking space. But when reading the comments on the net it is clear that it is not at at all a motorhome site. Thank you for checking it.

https://www.aireparkreservation.com/aires-camping-cars/nouvelle-aquitaine/deux-sevres/niort-la-roussille indicates a caravan_site with power_supply at this location but after studying mapillary images I agree that there are no services here. In fact there is a motorhome on Mapillary but there are no signs or markings indicating a caravan_site. I am not sure this should be marked as a caravan_site at all. But I updated it to reflect that there are no services.

For motorhome/camping car sites we use the tourism=caravan_site tag. When like here it is only for camping cars, it should be tagged with caravans=no. I have updated the site.

Kind of.
But low_emission_zone is only used on boundaries.

This is a motorhome_stopover site that informs potential users that it is outside any LEZ.

Of course this would not be necessary if all LEZ were tagged in OSM and apps knew to infer this when searching for stopovers.

No it is not a description, it is a descriptive name.
And many names are descriptive and there is nothing wrong in that.

The eastern station in Berlin is called "Berlin Ostbahnhof" which is also descriptive.

As are for example "Kita an der Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin"
node/6123173591

New York have a long beach which is named "Long Beach".

Stratford-upon-Avon is also descriptive.

Historically that is how most things are named.

Motorhome stopovers are just not that old. But they still have names.

As for the local community, the Luneburger Heide company is an umbrella organization for local cities/counties so I think we can assume that the names are locally known. Besides motorhome stopovers are used by non-local travelers, so we should also consider which names they use. It is comparable to e.g., marinas. If you ask the locals living next to Margreheholms Havn in Copenhagen, most would not know the name. But sailors do. And we also name small harbours on uninhabited islands. And we name uninhabited islands. And there did OSM get all those names from?

As for licence, I see no issue at double checking a dozen names with brochures from a tourist agency owned by official local administrations.

And it is not the only site using that name. If you search for "Wohnmobilstellplatz am Strandbad Dorfmark" you find other sites using the name or longer versions. I just mentioned Lüneburger Heide GmbH because it is the most official source.

I do not invent names. It is a name used by Lüneburger Heide GmbH and many others. Sources given.

It is associated with Strandbad Dorfmark which do have a beach: way/720186763

See https://www.strandbad-dorfmark.de/

Yes, the wikimedia tag was wrong, fixed

Thx for fixing what I did with my frozen fingers here.

Thank you, updated to match the website. The other number is registered in CVR:
https://datacvr.virk.dk/enhed/produktionsenhed/1023878433

So they probably got a new phone number for the store.

Der er vist gået noget galt med ensretning her:

way/35770445

Thank you for fixing it. I know the wiki, it was a sloppy copy-paste.

Jeg har de sidste måneder gennemgået en masse veje, der har vejfotos (Mapillary, KartaView, Bing streetview). Jeg har så bl.a. rettet stier, som jeg kan se på fotos ikke er tagget korrekt, og stier som åbenlyst er tagget forkert (fx hvor man på på luftfotos kan se biler, hvorfor det må være en service vej, eller hvor et stykke af en cykelsti er highway=steps). Men jeg har ikke rettet hele stisystemer, fordi jeg ikke har kilder til det. Ofte tyder meget på at hele stisystemet burde ændres, men som regel er der ikke anført præcise kilder i changesettet og jeg ved ikke hvorfor det er tagget som det er.

Problemet er efter min mening at nogen for at få sammenhæng bare har gættet ud fra luftfotos. Og ret tit er der gættet forkert, så der findes cykelstier, der er skiltet med cykling forbudt, osv. Hvis ikke ved andet så må man nøjes med at tagge som highway=path, og vente med at gøre det mere specifikt når man har vejfotos, eller nogen kommer forbi.

Tak.

Jeg ved ikke hvad der skete. Jeg må have fumlet med musen.

God torsdag til dig.

Jeg tror ikke at jeg har flyttet den, kun tilføjet den.

Jeg har fået adressen fra
https://findsmiley.dk/1251117
Som siger:
Byens Plads 20B

Men jeg kan se at adresseknuden for Byens Plads 20B er blevet flyttet, så den har nok været forkert, da jeg slog den op i Nominatim.

Adresseknuden#8 var på:
osm.org/?mlat=55.73052&mlon=9.11675#map=19/55.73046/9.11696

på Gl Aarhusvej, fx 466945661
har du ændret maxspeed til 40.

Betyder det at de tilstødende veje med maxspeed:advisory=40 (fx Bruunshåbvej) også har fået ny hastighedsgrænse efter Bing street billederne fra marts 2021?

done

Done, thank you