Could you be more descriptive with your changeset comments?

Thanks for letting me know, I've gone ahead and updated those aliases.

changeset/102591366

I agree.

This is quite the achievement.

Simply the reason for this change is to reduce tag fragmentation and improves data compatibility with applications that only use the far more common prefixed social media. Additionally, as no one else has seemed to tackle it yet, I may write up a proposal to formally deprecate the use of the non-prefixed social media keys along with a discussion for systematically updating the keys. Until then, the cleanup of the fragmented keys is halted.

The tags of the non-prefixed <site=*> has not yet been deprecated, however the very low tag usage and consensus with other members on the Discord, we decided to help with reducing the defragmentation by updating them to reflect the current documentation on the wiki.

I helped organize this indoor mapping project with some other fellow mappers. If you are in the OSM Discord you can see that message here. https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/641926452950073344/807089369848348704

Someone posted something about this area, as it is highly detailed. After we saw that the mall had no indoor data we decided to fix that.

Please separate changesets that span multiple countries.

However, could you explain what other things were considered massive errors other than that business? I would like to know so I wouldn’t do it again.

Thank you for making those fixes.

Could you please add comments to your changesets other than "updated" or leaving them blank? Even something as little as "cleaned up area geometry" or etc would suffice.

Thanks for the correction!

I will make sure to avoid confusion in the future with changesets such as this by using a more detailed changeset comment.

Hi,
I just want to let you know that I removed incorrect usage of amenity=picnic_table and when it applicable, it was changed it to leisure=picnic_table. Please look at the changeset history before making assumptions.

Please consider making it a habit to add comments to your changesets.

The nautral=scrub tags you removed from most of those areas should have not been removed as those areas are scrubs. If the scrub does not match the geometry of the preserves, then you should have made new areas rather than removing the data from the map.

What is the reasoning for this change? The land that this are occupies can be defined as a scrub as per the documentation on the wiki.

Thanks for your input, and I'll take it into consideration and avoid making large changesets like this.

Oh sorry my bad I was reading it wrong.

You really need to add descriptions of what you're doing. At the very least include a source. We have no idea of the meaning of this edit and if it's correct.