MikeN's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 62209005 | over 7 years ago | Also update road geometries per survey |
| 61901852 | over 7 years ago | Hi, Please add a meaningful comment to the changeset that explains the goal of the edit. It seems that some of these edits have lost information such as road name, lanes, etc. |
| 61631661 | over 7 years ago | I've observed new mappers drawing these types of sidewalks without crossings because they appear to 'stop at the curb'. They're just entering an observation. I'd see it as a work in progress, and not usable for navigation on its own until the network has been fully entered..
|
| 60342709 | over 7 years ago | Thank you - Bing has been updated since that survey and it is clearer that the shopping center is already built and was not mapped from planning document papers. |
| 60342709 | over 7 years ago | Why were these driveways reverted to construction state? |
| 60364351 | over 7 years ago | Try this link - https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ |
| 59948539 | over 7 years ago | It explicitly models the road as 2 traffic flows where normal size vehicles pass each other, as well as differentiating from 1 lane roads where one vehicle would need to back up to an opening to pass. |
| 59948539 | over 7 years ago | I also don't know of a convention in the US and Canada where it is incorrect to add lanes to stripeless roads. |
| 59298405 | over 7 years ago | I was so careful to get the 'e' on Pointe that I didn't proofread the whole name! |
| 59179094 | over 7 years ago | This edit was correct, in that it matches the new name on the latest TIGER, but the name didn't sound right. I checked the county records and they still show the old name Countryside Circle. So I'm not sure how the wrong name got into TIGER 2017. |
| 59180915 | over 7 years ago | I'm not sure that the result of this edit is desirable. Although it strictly agrees with the OSM philosophy of separate ways only in the case of physical divider, southbound routing instructions to Edwards Mill Road are "turn right", followed by "turn immediate left", instead of bear slight right. |
| 59114846 | over 7 years ago | The school name appears on the boundary of the school - in most cases with OSM, the building does not have the school name. That allows for multiple buildings, and having the name on the area makes it show sooner when zooming in. |
| 59027356 | over 7 years ago | Thank you for correcting this. Feel free to leave a note for someone local to look at any questionable items. (That's the way I learned that there is a wooden covered bridge near me that I had no idea was there). |
| 59027356 | over 7 years ago | Hi, thank you for this edit. What was the source for this change when there were recent edits and notes about this intersection? |
| 58394251 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for adding these new roads! A tip to make it easier to see the roads under the trees is to use the NC imagery - select the Layers button on the right side, then for Background select "NC Latest Orthoimagery" |
| 58393641 | over 7 years ago | Hi, I see that Long Pond Lane was added as a "motorway". Although this sounds like permission for motor vehicles, it is normally only used on Interstate highways. Small roads like this would normally be Residential or 'Minor/Unclassified' if there are no houses nearby. |
| 58039457 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Why was Burl Lane deleted in this changeset? |
| 58115218 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please take care when editing because a node was moved for a long distance by the stadium. That part of the edit was undone. |
| 57868426 | over 7 years ago | Hi, thank you for the edits! The ways marked as motorways are not really motorways. The best way to make a private map for events and share them is on UMap
This was reverted in #57880411 |
| 57617184 | over 7 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please be careful when editing because this edit removed a city boundary so I had to revert it. |