MikeN's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 77241757 | about 6 years ago | Hi, thanks for your contribution! This supermarket does not qualify as a park in OpenStreetMap and the park has been removed. Only map real objects in OSM - see leisure=park |
| 77196076 | about 6 years ago | Hi, great job on the bridge - that was correct. An option to add more information to the bridge would be to set the surface as metal instead of just paved. |
| 77114678 | about 6 years ago | Your vandalism deleted sequential OSM ID node numbers |
| 77067178 | about 6 years ago | Hi, in South Carolina there is no restriction about turning across double yellow lines, unlike some other states. Double yellow lines only separate opposing directions of traffic. |
| 76960592 | about 6 years ago | Hi, I noticed that the speed limits weren't marked past that intersection, and I found a message that the Tesla navigator could get confused when speed limit markings disappear suddenly. I've added the speed limits according to the SCDOT. I don't know how long it will take to update. It's possible that the SCDOT may not be accurate in that area - feel free to correct it if you are familiar with the speed limits. Also, if you collect and upload Mapillary imagery sequences, they will automatically detect speed limit signs. |
| 76929635 | about 6 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The default Bing imagery is usually the newest, however it may have a large offset. For example, in the Background Settings, compare with 'ESRI World Imagery Clarity (Beta)' , which is older but much closer to reality. Also, the usual convention is that land use such as Fairview Cemetery may be connected to other land uses, but not road centerlines, since it can complicate future road maintenance, and it does not extend to the center of the road. |
| 76654730 | about 6 years ago | Re: Parking lots - either way is acceptable. Individual parking areas are drawn when micro-mapping. A single large area is less cluttered on the map display. The landscaped islands and dividers could be drawn either way. For buildings - if a building houses a single POI such as Harris Teeter, it is best done as the building. For this example, copy the extra information from the node onto the building and delete the node. The businesses in the side buildings would be as nodes inside the building since there are multiple. |
| 76654730 | about 6 years ago | I think I have fixed the routing. The convention is to use plain service roads for entrances, and parking aisles inside the lot. I did split the entrances into 1-way because it looked like there was a divider on the aerial image and Bing StreetView. That will direct drivers entering McDonald's from Spartanburg Highway to the correct entrance. Driveway is mainly used for entrances to a residence, but is not totally wrong in a parking lot. |
| 76654730 | about 6 years ago | Thanks for adding these parking aisles - lots of great detail. But perhaps more detail than needed - the usual OSM convention is that 1-way paths are needed only if there is a physical divider. In this case for example, a Tesla trying to find the best route might have to take a longer path around the end of a parking aisle because there's no way to cross to the opposite direction. Let me know if you would like me to fix this and you can follow the example for another parking lot! |
| 75920786 | about 6 years ago | Hi, are all these roads really under construction? This lists Bing as a source, but none of them are visible on Bing. Do you have a source for these new roads? |
| 75484580 | about 6 years ago | Please explain the errors that required deleting. landuse=residential |
| 75350277 | about 6 years ago | Hi, Thanks for the addition. Normally, land use polygons are not tied to road centerlines in OSM because they do not extend to the center of the road. In addition, tying them together makes future roadway changes more difficult. The gap that was between the land use and road way is partly a rendering issue, and partly because the road width was not entered yet. On other map rendering, the gap may not be shown. |
| 74824627 | about 6 years ago | Hi, I noticed that Hyatt Street has been changed to a dual carriageway below I85, while the Mapillary and aerial images show only a 5 lane road. Normally we map as a separated dual carriageway in OpenStreetMap only if there is a physical divider. |
| 74454678 | over 6 years ago | Hi, thank you for the update. What type of road closure is this, and how long will it be closed? |
| 73720563 | over 6 years ago | Hi, South Carolina is different from some other states and Double Yellow lines here only indicate divided traffic flow and passing is not allowed. They are not prohibited to cross when turning. |
| 73720563 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Why were these turn restrictions added? I don't see any concrete divider. |
| 73695071 | over 6 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The editor shows Bing imagery because it is usually the newest , however it is often mis-aligned. The reference would be GPS traces, but there are none in this area. A better source is fom the background settings, choose "ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" to see the difference. |
| 73694652 | over 6 years ago | The information that you added was OK, but the convention is to use a more specific address format as this number was changed to. Also instead of a description of "Home", the building type would be set to house |
| 73278789 | over 6 years ago | Hi, Why were these sections of West Faris Road and Grove road changed to type Service? They are multi-lane traffic routes. |
| 73138090 | over 6 years ago | Hi, these turn restrictions can be more simply represented with a 1-way - I updated as 1-way. |