MikeN's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161098909 | 12 months ago | The comment implies bicycles permitted, but this change sets bicycle=no ? |
| 159893534 | about 1 year ago | Hi, why was this marked as residential? |
| 158901423 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Please don't delete and recreate road segments. Add, remove, or change the tags when needed. The original street marking of the road under the bridge was more informative since it had the height restriction. There is no longer any information here to prevent routers from sending oversize vehicles to go under the bridge. |
| 158856991 | about 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM! For this edit, the tracks above are marked as being the bridge. Normally there is no special attribute for roads below bridges except for maxheight which was already marked. |
| 157679580 | about 1 year ago | Hi, Why was I 40 marked as open? This was marked closed because the repair will take multiple months, possibly nearly a year and it will be useful to know for those using OSM for routing. https://drivenc.gov/?type=incident&id=713873 |
| 156120960 | about 1 year ago | Please take care when moving the map - it is easy to accidentally drag nodes as happened here.
|
| 156765780 | over 1 year ago | This is good work - FYI The OSM NC - SC boundary was separately updated in 2018 from the ratified NC-SC Geodetic survey, so those nodes shouldn't be moved unless they were accidentally dragged since then. |
| 154405473 | over 1 year ago | Normally driveways are retained on OpenStreetMap because they can provide hints to delivery or ride-share drivers. If there are no-trespassing signs or gates, the driveways can also be marked as access = private. |
| 152463654 | over 1 year ago | Hi, normally access=private is used when there is a gate or no trespassing sign. If it is just private ownership but accessed the same as a public road, it would be marked ownership=private . But there may be a sign or gate that doesn't show on imagery. |
| 152056708 | over 1 year ago | Hi, normally apartment areas are defined as landuse=residential and residential=apartments rather than one large apartment building. |
| 22871440 | over 1 year ago | Updated tag to more standard OSM tag tailor |
| 148925398 | over 1 year ago | The actual spelling of tags is not important - the application needs to know that "blowout", "flat" and "tire" can suggest tire shops. The database key value happens to be 'tyre' but that is hidden from the end consumer. There is a significant value to the database to use a single key value worldwide. |
| 150055073 | over 1 year ago | Thanks for clarifying. Do you plan to add the lots back with the new numbers? Otherwise the next mapper will add the parking lots again when they notice them missing. |
| 150055073 | over 1 year ago | Hi - why were the parking lots deleted? They still exist. |
| 148308638 | almost 2 years ago | Using the setting access=destination should help - delivery drivers would be directed there as long as the delivery is on that road, but GPS should not give directions using that road as a connection from one to another. |
| 148121167 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, what was the reason for downgrading this section which connects other tertiary roads? |
| 147645023 | almost 2 years ago | Yes, they can be removed since they are a duplicate. Thanks! |
| 147646619 | almost 2 years ago | Nice job adding these sidewalks, thanks! |
| 147645023 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM! The bike lanes on North Main are already identified. They are included with the roadway tags because there is no barrier between the cycle lane and the auto lane. Please see the Wiki cycleway=lane |
| 147040927 | almost 2 years ago | A method of adding to street VS area may work better in one area than another. It can get pretty abstract when counting spaces, handicap, and maximum allowed parking times left / right and as a result the street could be chopped into many pieces along a block |