osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

osm.wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна#[прийнято]_Угода_про_порядок_слів_в_назві_вулиці_(2009)

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

osm.wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна#[прийнято]_Угода_про_порядок_слів_в_назві_вулиці_(2009)

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

osm.wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна#[прийнято]_Угода_про_порядок_слів_в_назві_вулиці_(2009)

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

osm.wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна#[прийнято]_Угода_про_порядок_слів_в_назві_вулиці_(2009)

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

osm.wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

EMAS at RESA/SWY is usually marked with yellow chevrons — it's not very hard obtainable from satellite imagery. But yes, the markings may not have been applied at the time of the satellite imagery for some reason.

1. Yes, AIPs are government documents. But as everywhere, there can be errors, as well as outdated information. For example, in Nalchik AIP chart with 15 parking positions for today, but de facto there are 16 and the de facto parking lanes has been changed.

2. I have no desire to develop new aero marking schemes in OSM wiki. I'm marking objects of my interest in according to the current OSM wiki description. At the moment aeroway=stopway on the wiki corresponds to a way-type object where there is EMAS coverage on RESA (e.g. Barajas) or on SWY (e.g. Badajoz).

However, I am willing to answer your questions if there is anything I would know.

Yes, and not only in Russia. For example, stopways in Barajas, which are added by you also incorrectly.

Although AIP Spain displays that stopways are not here https://aip.enaire.es/AIP/contenido_AIP/AD/AD2/LEMD/LE_AD_2_LEMD_en.pdf as for example they are available in Badajoz https://aip.enaire.es/AIP/contenido_AIP/AD/AD2/LEBZ/LE_AD_2_LEBZ_ADC_1_en.pdf, but RESA https://aip.enaire.es/AIP/contenido_AIP/AD/AD2/LEMD/LE_AD_2_LEMD_ADC_1_en.pdf with EMAS coverage in Barajas by aeroway=stopway correspond exactly with aeroway=stopway.

way/27315889 & way/593853508

At the same time, you added aeroway=stopway to objects in Barajas, plots of 240x60 + 102x30 meters on 18L and 240x60 + 70x30 meters on 32R, even though the charts show RESA 240x150 in both cases, and live (with EMAS coverage) 240x60 in both cases. The 102x30 and 70x30 sections are unnecessary, they are not aeroway=stopway, nor are they aeroway=clearway (CWY), based on the AIP charts.

The clearway is an area-type object... https://www.skybrary.aero/articles/clearway

The stopway is an extremely rare object at airfields in Russia

http://www.caiga.ru/ANI_Official/Aip/html/eng.htm — the official charts & AIP

Hello. For some reason, you replaced the icao=* to old_icao=* and iata=* to old_iata=*. Yes, this former international airport isn't an airport anymore, but not demolished. His status is now a airstrip. At the same time, ICAO and IATA weren't canceled for today

source? http://www.caiga.ru/DocAni/manual_of_4_letter_indexes/Indexes_of_Airports.pdf

There is also no RESA

Hello.

http://www.caiga.ru/ANI_Official/Aip/aipsource1/aip/ad/ad2/urmn/1-ad2-rus-urmn-031-031-1.pdf

stopway (SWY) != clearway (CWY)

thanks

way/1143362455