This conflicts with the information in Croatian Cadastral Geoportal, which seems to be more complete.

Please join discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/granica-hr-bih-bivsa-vojna-baza-aerodrom-zeljava/139411 to resolve this dispute.

Thakns! no, that was my mistake, I've missed the other parking while fixing note/4345796

I've tried to clean it up now (using LiDAR 2022+2023 Croatia imagery, as it is higher precision than regular 2023+2024)... most of the uncovered area does not look like a parking lot but something else (there is only few marked parking spaces on the southern part).
Anyway, if you have better local knowledge, feel free to further improve!

Hm, za Gemini (node/338798325) vidim da si provjerio 1.8.2025 i dodao telefon (i strgani facebook link)...

To si zvao/vidio osobno da radi ili? Jer ja nisam vidio da radi, a sudski registar kaže da su u stečaju: https://sudreg.pravosudje.hr/ords/r/esudreg/public/podaci-o-poslovnom-subjektu?p28_sbt_mbs=081326892

Hm, Amazinga (https://amazinga.fun/atrakcije/) i slični su prije leisure=indoor_play što je bilo originalno nego leisure=sports_centre ("Facilities within a sports centre may include swimming pools, spa, solarium, sauna and/or steam room, sports hall, squash courts, fitness suite, aerobics studios, outdoor grass and/or artificial pitches for football (soccer), hockey etc") na što si bio promijenio?

Hi @mueschel

I've noticed you've changed `image:menu` to `menu:url` in node/12211682359/history/3

Is there a reason? Neither seems documented on the wiki and both seem to have similar (few dozen) usages.

But changing it breaks https://mapcomplete.org/food.html in this case, so there is that disadvantage.

Did you perhaps mean more popular (and documented) website:menu ?

Also see https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2498

navodno puštena u pogon; maknuo sam access=no i barrier=block isto, i spojio biciklističke (ima li i dalje na spoju za bicikle?) - https://kaportal.net.hr/aktualno/vijesti/karlovac/1358872/u-promet-pustena-nova-cesta-ilovac-orlovac-izgradile-je-hrvatske-zeljeznice-to-je-dio-projekta-izgradnje-drugog-kolosijeka-pruge/ #surveyme

Website works just fine, see e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20250509121736/https://www.parasailing.com.hr/. User has contacted local OSM group, so we're helping him to re-add it will full tags. I'll revert this changeset.

Given the node on which name tag was removed, referenced wiki is likely place=ocean - but I haven't really seen a discussion on the issue either

Pozdrav, i hvala na sudjelovanju u OSM mapathonu!

Ispravio sam ovdje uličnu lampu sa tagom highway=street_lamp

Također, "name" tag koristimo samo za prava imena (npr. naziv kafića, trgovine, muzeja...) a ne za opise.

Ukoliko imaš bilo kakvih dodatnih pitanja ili nejasnoća, slobodno pitaj ovdje ili na nekom od komunikacijskih kanala: https://osm-hr.org/openstreetmap-hrvatska/

Hvala još jednom i nadam se da je bilo zanimljivo!

Hi, I see you've set `bicycle=no` on many secondary roads where I do not see explicit signs prohibiting bicycles. In Croatia, bicycles are only implicitly disallowed on `highway=motorway` and "Brze ceste rezervirane za promet motornih vozila" (usually `highway=trunk`). Everywhere else, bicycles are allowed (you may want to add `class:bicycle:non_experienced=-x` to indicate it's not a good idea even if lawful)

Also, if there is cycleway alongside a road, please use `bicycle=use_sidepath` instead of `bicycle=no`.

Mala je vjerojatnost da se sjećaš od pred 13 godina, ali ovaj izgleda parking u Zadru si označio kao driving_school? imaš možda ideju? note/4279099

Sjećaš li se gdje si točno vidio bicycle_repair_station kod AKC Medika (node/9242979091), jer ga ne pronalazim?

Hi Miro! Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but please do not do such huge unilateral changes as modifying `admin_level` without prior consultation with Croatian community. I'm going to revert this (as preliminary decided in Croatian telegram channel), and have opened a topic in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/admin-level-u-hrvatskoj/120865 for further discussion.

Please feel free to explain there why you think `admin_level` should be changed in Croatia; and then we can proceed after the community consensus is reached.

Thanks in advance!

Thanks for your insight; I've created a topic at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adding-image-menu-on-resturants/120806 to try to find community consensus

Hi @mueschel!

I gather you imply that explicit owner permission should be required? Can you clarify why you think so?

@Mateusz, "building=maybe" meant that it is unclear from aerial view whether that is a building or ruins or something else (parking?...)

When DGU Croatia 2024 aerials get published, perhaps we'd see better. (or if someone on the ground surveys)

Pozdrav, je li way/140487087 zaista autoškola? Izgleda kao parking. Ili se možda koristi (i) kao poligon za testne vožnje?

Hi, thanks for the notice, and sorry for a delay! If you know opening_date (when it will be fully finished), it would be good to add that tag, so it can be checked semi-automatically when finished (e.g. via opening_date=*#Practical_useand either online survey or armchair news searches). But if that "almost" is really just few weeks away, I'm also fine if you prefer to mark them as finished (I've seen too many that get to 90% and then stop due to various issues and turn to ruins instead of being finished, so I personally prefer not to try predicting the future).

As for the imagery, DGU Imagery for Croatia for 2022 (and newer) you can find on https://github.com/osm-hr/mapproxy-hr/ or https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dgu-ortofoto-2021-2022-2023/116081/5

I've added sources to changeset tag; which is preferred usage nowdays according to source=*, hopefully that is fine.

Cheers and happy mapping!

Thanks, I'm aware, unfortunately that is not the only one.
I wish it was typo, but that is due to bug in Commons app (see https://github.com/commons-app/apps-android-commons/issues/5762) which seems to have lost a lot of my queued uploads. :(

As it looks there is no way of getting them back, now that I'm back on flat Internet I'm working of re-creating them with appropriate metadata, but that is slow work (lot of other backlog too). Hopefully I'll be able to catch them up in the next few weeks.
And thanks again for your vigilance!

Hi, just a note if you're not aware: when a (part of the) stream passes under the houses/roads, it should be marked tunnel=culvert

Thanks for mapping!