way/1222795651#map=19/52.037947/23.116959&layers=N

building=yes
historic=tomb

w tej okolicy wyglądają na wadliwe, wszystkie które sprawdziłem do tej pory wadliwe były

powinno być cemetery=grave

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Zu7 więcej znajduje podejrzanych (ale nie wszystkie są błędne)

way/100838754/history has tracktype = fixme

Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value

way/98885598/history has tracktype = fixme

Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value

way/98887733/history has tracktype = fixme

Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value

way/98890135/history has tracktype = fixme

Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value

way/103276335/history has tracktype = fixme

Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value

way/649329720/history has shop = builders_merchant

shop=builders_merchant ? Is it shop=doityourself or shop=trade + trade=building_supplies ? If not, how it differs?

way/968530786/history has shop = builders_merchant

shop=builders_merchant ? Is it shop=doityourself or shop=trade + trade=building_supplies ? If not, how it differs?

way/397102889/history is tagged as building = proposed

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.